Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Shannon@*****.co.za (Shannon Buys)
Subject: Plastic Rat's FADG's [ADMIN QUESTION]
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:20:50 +0200
Jconstable wrote:

>>If you haven't received an offers to date, and its not breaking any
>>copyright (Adam? what do you think?), I would be glad to. My site isn't
>>pretty, but its more a place to make stuff available..

Recieved one other offer, but I like your site. All I want is a place for
people to DL them with some decent information available. If they want
pretty pics, got to the main SR site.

ADAM. or any other Admins, do you guys see any copyright issues involved
here?
Message no. 2
From: adamj@*********.com (Adam Jury)
Subject: Plastic Rat's FADG's [ADMIN QUESTION]
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:54:19 -0500
At 09:20 1/27/2003, Shannon Buys wrote:

>Recieved one other offer, but I like your site. All I want is a place for
>people to DL them with some decent information available. If they want
>pretty pics, got to the main SR site.
>
>ADAM. or any other Admins, do you guys see any copyright issues involved
>here?

Err - I haven't read all the guides in question, but from what I've seen
they're your own material, so there's no problem with you posting it,
providing you follow the guidelines at http://www.shadowrunrpg.com/legal.shtml

If the files include reproductions of FanPro text, then it's probably not
wise to post them. If it contains reproductions of short FanPro tables,
it's generally no big deal. If you have questions about specific content,
email it to me and I'll give it a look.

Best,
Adam
--
| Editor, The Shadowrun Supplemental: http://tss.dumpshock.com |
| adamj@*********.com | http://www.talkinabout.com | UIN: 2350330 |

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Plastic Rat's FADG's [ADMIN QUESTION], you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!