Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Erik Jameson <erikj@****.COM>
Subject: Powered Armor Idea
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 13:27:32 -0400
At 04:34 PM 5/22/98 +1200, you wrote:
>Quoth MgkellyMP5 (0922 21-5-98):
>
>>Reminds me of an article I saw in Shadowland a couple years ago about
>Acers.
<snipped>

Actually, I wrote another powered armor article for Shadowland, I think
Issue #4 or 5 I think.

Took a different tack than the ACER concept, and while it might not mesh
well with R2, at the time I thought it was better game-balanced than the
ACERs were. My opinion though. As I recall, they were more expensive, but
also had lots of options for personalizing the powered armor (including
price charts). And they came in two basic models, a "power lifting"
chassis and a "speed" chassis, since I still think those capabilities are
really mutually exclusive.

If you want to see what I came up with for powered armor, e-mail me at
GKoth2258@***.com with a really obvious subject header; I get *LOTS* of
friggin' spam and unless I know what an e-mail is, I tend to delete it
without looking.

But if someone wants to look at it on an individual basis, let me know.

As a note to people: while Shadowland has folded, as far as I know,
everything that was published in that magazine is the property of FASA.
Which means that I don't believe that you can take those articles and slap
them up on a web site; that's one huge reason I still don't have my own site.

Anyway, let me know at my home address if you want to look at that article.

Erik J.


"Forgive me FASA for I have sinned. It has been 6 days since I last played
Shadowrun and 15 days since I last bought a SRTCG booster pack."

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Powered Armor Idea, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.