Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: The Deb Decker <RJR96326@****.UTULSA.EDU>
Subject: Private Eyes
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1993 15:49:52 -0500
Officially, cybereyes include both eyes. The reasoning is that the brain
doesn't adapt to easily to one image type to the other. But the
Reverend
raises a good point about the camera eye. Why not allow another option
in the opposite eye, like this:
Right: thermo, Camera
Left: Thermo, Ret print.

J Roberson
Gott Run!
Message no. 2
From: Justin Kim <jlkim%ucsd.edu@****.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Private Eyes
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1993 15:19:52 -0800
><stuff deleted>
>raises a good point about the camera eye. Why not allow another option
>in the opposite eye, like this:
>Right: thermo, Camera
>Left: Thermo, Ret print.
>
>J Roberson
>Gott Run!

Having a camera in both eyes would allow the user to take a stereo
picture. This might not be a big deal for taking pictures of documents,
but it might be good for snapping off pics of the latest starlet for a
scream sheet :-) or documenting physical evidence of a corp's latest
atrocity.

Justin

----------
Justin Kim jlkim@****.edu
Science Applications International Corporation Defense Analyst
"They tell you that the darkness is a blessing in disguise, for you never
have to notice if you're sighted or blind and they'll do their best to keep
you from the light."
-Janis Ian, "From Me to You"

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Private Eyes, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!