Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Rabid Dwarf <jjstoltenber@*******.EDU>
Subject: Proffesional/Threat Ratings
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 17:41:26 -0500
Maybe I missed the boat, but why in the BBB does it talk about
threat ratings for creatures then never give any? Did I simply miss it in
the text? Also, does anyone recall which book started the proffesional
rating thingy and possibly what it means? I'm a veteran GM but I've been
away from SR for about 2 1/2 years.

Thanks for any info you can provide :).

Jon Stoltenberg
aka. Rabid Dwarf
Message no. 2
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Proffesional/Threat Ratings
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 11:54:35 +0100
Rabid Dwarf said on 17:41/28 Feb 98...

> Maybe I missed the boat, but why in the BBB does it talk about
> threat ratings for creatures then never give any? Did I simply miss it in
> the text? Also, does anyone recall which book started the proffesional
> rating thingy and possibly what it means? I'm a veteran GM but I've been
> away from SR for about 2 1/2 years.

Threat ratings for critters are mentioned on page 86 of SRII, under
Critter Threat Ratings (duh! :) There's more about them, and Professional
Ratings, on SRII page 187, plus issue #5 of Shadowland has an article that
expands them somewhat. </plug for my own article>

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - UIN5044116
They say they know what's best for me.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Proffesional/Threat Ratings, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!