Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "J. Keith Henry" <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Psionic Rules (Pondering)
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 12:24:44 -0400
In a message dated 97-08-02 07:27:02 EDT, vanyel@*******.NET (Justin Pinnow)
writes:

>
> Hello! I have just finished my first draft of Psionic rules for Shadowrun
> and would like some opinions on my work. However, since the document is
> about 3 pages long, I don't want to post it to the list. Thus, if anyone
> is interested in taking a look at the rules I have designed, I would be
> more than happy to send them to you in trade for some constructive
> feedback. If you are interested, please e-mail me privately.

Really? Only 3...that seems interesting. Very simple I would imagine. The
rules for "Psychonetics" that we worked out here took 3 years and now
encompasses 52 pages, including tables, special archetype overlaps,
differentiates between the "Master Talents" and the "Subordinates".
It isn't
like AD&D, if anything I would have to say its' a bit like the Marvel System.
Sure, you're a Telepath, but you can't read my mind without developing that
specifically.

There were lots of people here that told me I should have submitted it, but I
wasn't really certain that FASA, Tom in particular at the time, would have
enjoyed an entirely new "subset" of the paranormal entering in SR so boldly.

It also reworked the Skillweb concerning the Willpower, Charisma, and
Intelligence in regards to all the magic -AND- the Psychonetics. In the end
it really worked, but it had evidence of "falling into the Powergamers"
hands, if you get my drift (hey, those Cost 12 powers were really cool, just
not very believable.

> Any takers? Oh, come on. You know you're curious. ;)

I am very interested, but I goofed the reply options here. My address is
"ereskanti@***.com"...some people have problems with replying to it, so
perhaps the "e" is capitalized for some.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Psionic Rules (Pondering), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.