Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Steven Ratkovich <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Punishing Nightlife (was Re: Punishing Munchies.)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 21:55:53 -0500
>That six do I hear seven. I figure once I get 10 or twenty response no
>double response please. I'll stop the thread
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nightlife Inc.
>
Ok, I'm taking votes for the most creative way to punish Nightlife for this
thread...:) Any volunteers???

<grin>

-Bull-the-punisher-decker-turned-GM

<just yankin' your chain, NL:)>
Message no. 2
From: Pete <Pete@********.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Punishing Nightlife (was Re: Punishing Munchies.)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 03:40:40 +0100
In article <199610230255.VAA17150@***.ncweb.com>, Steven Ratkovich
<chaos@*****.COM> writes
>>That six do I hear seven. I figure once I get 10 or twenty response no
>>double response please. I'll stop the thread
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nightlife Inc.
>>
>Ok, I'm taking votes for the most creative way to punish Nightlife for this
>thread...:) Any volunteers???

Yeah, throw down a gauntlet that contains irrelevant film references
nine dead frogs and one dying mutant frog, then make him pick it up :)
:)


Of course there's also the possibility of allowing a non-existent racial
type to personally deliver it to him :) :)

><grin>
>
>-Bull-the-punisher-decker-turned-GM
>
><just yankin' your chain, NL:)>
ditto

Pete

--
Pete Sims
Civilisation advances by extending the number of important operations which we
can perform without thinking about them.
Message no. 3
From: NightLife <habenir@******.SAN.UC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Punishing Nightlife (was Re: Punishing Munchies.)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 07:08:11 -0700
>>Ok, I'm taking votes for the most creative way to punish Nightlife for this
>>thread...:) Any volunteers???
>
>Yeah, throw down a gauntlet that contains irrelevant film references
>nine dead frogs and one dying mutant frog, then make him pick it up :)
>:)
>
>
>Of course there's also the possibility of allowing a non-existent racial
>type to personally deliver it to him :) :)
>
Dooh! Your suffering will be legendary even in Hell! ;-)


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nightlife Inc.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you have to ask then it's probably classified.
Which means that I have to follow protocol.
But if you ask nicely I might forget that you asked.
Then again maybe not.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Document Classified
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Message no. 4
From: Tim Kerby <tkerby@***.NET>
Subject: Re: Punishing Nightlife (was Re: Punishing Munchies.)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 19:00:53 EDT
On Tue, 22 Oct 1996 21:55:53 -0500 SR wrote:
>Ok, I'm taking votes for the most creative way to punish Nightlife for this
>thread...:) Any volunteers???

How about put attachments on his mails? :)
<ducking for cover>



==================|======================================================
tkerby@***.net | Never relax. Your run may be over, but someone, somewhere,
drekhead@***.com | is just starting his and the target could be you.
drekhead@*******.com | ---www.aol.users.com\drekhead\home.html---
==================|======================================================
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GB d-(+) s: a C++(+++)>++++$ U--- P L+ E? W++>$ N o? K-? w+()>--- O++>$ M--
V? PS+ PE++ Y PGP- t++>$ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI++(+) D++ G e>++ h--- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Message no. 5
From: NightLife <habenir@******.SAN.UC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Punishing Nightlife (was Re: Punishing Munchies.)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 09:15:09 -0700
At 07:00 PM 10/23/96 EDT, Tim Kerby wrote:
>On Tue, 22 Oct 1996 21:55:53 -0500 SR wrote:
>>Ok, I'm taking votes for the most creative way to punish Nightlife for this
>>thread...:) Any volunteers???
>
>How about put attachments on his mails? :)
><ducking for cover>
>
Sorry Pete and Bull already tried that one. ;-)


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nightlife Inc.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you have to ask then it's probably classified.
Which means that I have to follow protocol.
But if you ask nicely I might forget that you asked.
Then again maybe not.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Document Classified
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Message no. 6
From: Pete <Pete@********.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Punishing Nightlife (was Re: Punishing Munchies.)
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 01:05:11 +0100
In article <1.5.4.32.19961023161509.00663270@******.san.uc.edu>,
NightLife <habenir@******.SAN.UC.EDU> writes
>At 07:00 PM 10/23/96 EDT, Tim Kerby wrote:
>>On Tue, 22 Oct 1996 21:55:53 -0500 SR wrote:
>>>Ok, I'm taking votes for the most creative way to punish Nightlife for this
>>>thread...:) Any volunteers???
>>
>>How about put attachments on his mails? :)
>><ducking for cover>
>>
>Sorry Pete and Bull already tried that one. ;-)

Ooohhh! Not true, we didn't .... Honest 'guv... <grin>

--
Pete Sims
Civilisation advances by extending the number of important operations which we
can perform without thinking about them.
Message no. 7
From: NightLife <habenir@******.SAN.UC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Punishing Nightlife (was Re: Punishing Munchies.)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 21:06:00 -0700
>
>Ooohhh! Not true, we didn't .... Honest 'guv... <grin>
>
>--
>Pete Sims

On that note I'm going to bed.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nightlife Inc.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you have to ask then it's probably classified.
Which means that I have to follow protocol.
But if you ask nicely I might forget that you asked.
Then again maybe not.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Document Classified
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Punishing Nightlife (was Re: Punishing Munchies.), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.