Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Andrew aosborne@*******.com
Subject: Question about Mnemonic Enhancer
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 20:25:13 +1000
Question re Mnemonic Enhancer (page 73 Man and Machine - 2nd paragraph.)

"Because memory retention is key to learning, the Karma cost for learning or
improving skills is reduced by a number equal to the level of the mnemonic
enhancer, to a minimum of 1"

Is this referring to ALL skill or just language and knoledge skills?

Thanks in Advance
sr@*******.com
Message no. 2
From: HHackerH@***.com HHackerH@***.com
Subject: Question about Mnemonic Enhancer
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 06:19:29 EDT
In a message dated 4/25/2000 5:06:24 AM , aosborne@*******.com writes:

> "Because memory retention is key to learning, the Karma cost for learning or
> improving skills is reduced by a number equal to the level of the mnemonic
> enhancer, to a minimum of 1"
>
> Is this referring to ALL skill or just language and knoledge skills?

All Skills is the reference, though many individuals have desired to
errata/alter this in their house rules to just Language and Knowledge Skills.

-K
Message no. 3
From: Sebastian Wiers m0ng005e@*********.com
Subject: Question about Mnemonic Enhancer
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:48:05 -0500
From: HHackerH@***.com <HHackerH@***.com>

:> "Because memory retention is key to learning, the Karma cost for learning
or
:> improving skills is reduced by a number equal to the level of the
mnemonic
:> enhancer, to a minimum of 1"
:>
:> Is this referring to ALL skill or just language and knoledge skills?
:
:All Skills is the reference, though many individuals have desired to
:errata/alter this in their house rules to just Language and Knowledge
Skills.


The house rule I plan to use is that yes, it applies to all skill, but
the karma cost reduction applies (in total) to all times that skill is
improved, not to each individual time the skill is raised.
In other words, if raise a skill, you can knock of 1 of the karma cost
to do so if you have a mnemonic enhancer rating 1. If you raise it again
and you still only have a rating 1 mnemonic Enhancer, you already knocked 1
of the cost of improving that skill, so you get not further reduction.

Mongoose

_____________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Message no. 4
From: Phil Smith phil_urbanhell@*******.com
Subject: Question about Mnemonic Enhancer
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 20:12:03 GMT
>:> "Because memory retention is key to learning, the Karma cost for
>learning
>or
>:> improving skills is reduced by a number equal to the level of the
>mnemonic
>:> enhancer, to a minimum of 1"
>:>
>:> Is this referring to ALL skill or just language and knoledge skills?
>:
>:All Skills is the reference, though many individuals have desired to
>:errata/alter this in their house rules to just Language and Knowledge
>Skills.
>
>
> The house rule I plan to use is that yes, it applies to all skill, but
>the karma cost reduction applies (in total) to all times that skill is
>improved, not to each individual time the skill is raised.
> In other words, if raise a skill, you can knock of 1 of the karma cost
>to do so if you have a mnemonic enhancer rating 1. If you raise it again
>and you still only have a rating 1 mnemonic Enhancer, you already knocked 1
>of the cost of improving that skill, so you get not further reduction.
>

It would make a hell of a lot of sense to me to make it only skills linked
to Intellegence, not that I know.

Phil
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Question about Mnemonic Enhancer, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.