Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Patrick Goodman remo@***.net
Subject: FW: Question about UGE and Goblinization
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 22:22:20 -0600
Don't know if this made it out or not the first time; my ISP was having mail
server problems.

In any case, this is what the DLOH had to say about it. Basically, I was
wrong and you guys were right.

Patrick

-----Original Message-----
From: FASAMike@***.com [mailto:FASAMike@***.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 6:08 PM
To: remo@***.net
Subject: Re: Question about UGE and Goblinization



In a message dated 2/18/99 12:46:20 AM, you wrote:

<SNIP lot of discussion on Elves and dwarves>

>As I said (or at least implied) before: There's *no* way that there are as
>many elves and dwarves in the world as there are without *some* of them
>transforming as the mana threshold crested in the 2011-2017 timeframe.
>There aren't *that* many IEs running about, nor can you convince me that
>there were that many spike babies. There are too many old elves running
>around for all (or any, for that matter) of them to have been born since
>2011.
>
>So I have to ask, in conjunction with the severly truncated question above:
>What's the official FASA line on this? Mike M.? Steve K.?
>
>===== END QUOTED MESSAGE #2 ====>
>I was wondering, O Mighty Line Developer, Sir <g>: What *is* the official
>line on this?
>
>Thanks,
>Patrick

Nearly all elves were born of human parents - very very few are spike babies
and even fewer immortal. All dwarves were born of human parents. There were
no
elven or dwarven "goblinizations".

I hope this helps -

I

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Question about UGE and Goblinization, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.