Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Mon goose <landsquid@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Question A: not goat
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 12:24:34 PST
>Come one, Come All! 100,000,000 nuyen and 100 Karma to the first one
to
>give a definitive answer to the question everybody's asking. Is it a
dragon
>or a goat? Or is it something else altogether...
>

Well,its NOT an (acurately drawn) goat skull. The eyes are frontaly
placed, indicating some sort of predator (goats, like most herbivors,
lack good binocular vision because their eyesare on the sides). It has
some extra bones, too.

If dragons are like most reptiles, it isn't likely a dragon skull
either. Reptile skulls are delicate, more cage-work like, never with
fully enclosed eyes , and thier nasal pasages are not generally large or
shaped as drawn (although a fire breathing dragon would be a likely
exception).

My guess would be a dragon, given the game. If you immagine it with
flesh, a dragon seems right.

Runners up would be a Wyvern or a Piasma (one of those horned bears).
The piasma has the advantage of having the right nasal type, but somehow
that doesn't look like a bear skull to me - to narrow.

The easiest way to solve it would be to turn it over and look at the
teeth. very different in goats and predatory reptiles (and bears). But
its just a peice of 2d art.


Mongoose / Technological progress is like an ax in the hands
of a psychotic - Einstein

get sucked into -The Vortex- Chicago's shadowland BBS
http://www.concentric.net/~evamarie/srmain.htm


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Question A: not goat, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.