Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: runnerpaul@*****.com runnerpaul@*****.com
Subject: RC Deck Ranges [was: Misc SR q's]
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 14:31:02 -0400 (EDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 10:01 AM 4/30/1999 -0700, Oliver McDonald wrote:
>Nope. The van can Transmit to 2Km, the CRD can transmit to 250m. If
you are more
>than 250m from the van, it cannot hear you,

Actually, acording to Rigger2 author Jon Szeto, his intentions were
that RC Decks have sensitive enough radio receivers to be able to pick
out transmissions from even a Flux 0 device out to the effective range
of the Deck. It's true that normally, transmissions from a Flux 0
device can only travel 250m before loosing signal strength, but
however, RC Decks are supposed to be able to pick out signals that are
too weak to be detected normally.

It helps to look at this from a slightly different angle. Imagine
instead of a rigger using his CRD to remotely operate a RC Deck off in
a van somewhere, imagine a rigger using a RC Deck to operate a 6-inch,
Body 0 microcrawler drone.

While there aren't any rules in the R2 book for the Flux of the
Transmitter that drones' Remote Control Interface use (*), a tiny Body
0 drone is not going to be able to broadcast a signal that would be
much stronger than the signal broadcast from a CRD, right?

However, everything in the rules seems to indicate that you can
operate the Body 0 drone out to the full 2km range of the RC deck, and
still receive a full simsense feed and drone telemetry data. Say the
Rigger then gets a signal amplifier that boosts the Flux of his RC
Deck up to a Flux of 8. By what the rules seem to indicate, then you
should be able to run that Body 0 drone out to 20km, and still receive
the drone's transmissions.

If an RC Deck can receive transmissions from a Body 0 drone out to the
edge of it's range, then an RC Deck should also be able to receive
transmissions from a Flux 0 CRD out to the edge of it's range too,
right?


(*) Footnote: While not officially in the rules, earlier this week,
when Mr. Szeto was questioned about the Flux Rating of Remote Control
Interfaces, he did say they should be Flux 0, since after all, the RCI
both weighs a negligible amount at a Load 0 and takes up a negligible
amount of space at CF 0. He did point out that the rules on p.30 of
R2, for using a vehicle's/drone's powerplant to boost flux would work
for boosting the flux of the RCI.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2

iQCVAwUBNyn0nKPbvUVI86rNAQFvYwP/a3okpgxGFIychRnLB/RtxnIpUUkPZ/sf
gkdfP08cKHZZyqfKBLCJEQ1V4s+ZIsK4CV8fE1E1v74VON7SwloDG+AOoP3lYfXT
97NOQWMGRHY4ht3h9VGZPyLDcnKTc4/R4PciHEUEuS/SZg+zIBW/CsGTch1OX9qx
c2fz/fzdc0E=S7rH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
-- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344

---------------------------------------------------
Get free personalized email at http://www.iname.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about RC Deck Ranges [was: Misc SR q's], you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.