Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Wolfchild nathan.olsen@*******.msus.edu
Subject: Reaction and Combat (was Re: Combat timing)
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 13:39:06 -0500 (CDT)
you wrote:

> AH, but the person who gets to go 4xs is pressing the trigger four
> times. Here's where the reasoning goes bye-bye. In this case, apparently
> (I've never fired a weapon before in my life, so I don't know for sure),
> it takes less than .75 seconds to fire 10 bullets. That means it takes
> less than .075 seconds to fire a bullet. The limiting factor is the
> human pulling the trigger, not the speed of the weapon. Again, I've
> never used a weapon, but it doesn't seem very unrealistic to me.

I see your point about trigger-time. We just figured it was simpler to
treat 8 bullets over 8 simple actions as SA mode rather than four 2-bullet
FA bursts (complex actions). Perhaps we'll experiment with the latter
option so the gunner doesn't get the SA recoil bonus. *ponders*

[snip]
> Actually, I do remember that quote from somewhere, the one about 10
> bullets per FA. Maybe we should ask someone (like Paul J. Adam) for more
> info.

I remember the example used in the BBB2 for FA fire had a guy firing
exactly 10 bullets at (I think) 3 gangers. Anyway it seemed like a good
number at the time.


Wolfchild - "Life ain't easy for a troll named Sue."
--
"Quin tu istanc orationem hinc veterem atque|"Let us spend one day as
antiquam amoves?" -Plautus, Miles Gloriosus|deliberately as Nature. . .
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--|and not be thrown off the
"There are nights when the wolves are silent|track by every nutshell and
and only the moon howls." -George Carlin |mosquito's wing that falls on
Wolfchild <nathan.olsen@*******.msus.edu> |the rails." -H.D.Thoreau

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Reaction and Combat (was Re: Combat timing), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.