Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Helge Diernaes <ecocide@***.CBS.DK>
Subject: Really old fighters are good.
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 14:25:29 +0100
On Tue, 17 Oct 1995, Marc A Renouf wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 1995, Stainless Steel Rat wrote:
>
> > Actually, it's because the fight choreographer (can't remember his name)
> > is a complete putz when it comes to fight choreography, and that's his
> > attitude towards actors and fight scenes. He's wrong, and has been
> > proven wrong on many occasions, but he has the film credits to back him
> > up (Highlander, The Princess Bride, etc.).
>
> Not to mention the fact that if the fights were "realistic" no
> one would want to see them. Actual combat between skilled foes generally
> takes a surprisingly small amount of time. All it requires is one mistake.

You're right there. Fencing between skilled combatants usually runs for
about 5 secs max with a flurry of parries and attacks.
Ofcourse, in fencing, all it takes is a solid penetration.
In escrima II - Philipine Stickfighting - the average combat until one is
immobilised lasts max 10 secs when the parties get down to business.
It ain't flashy - but who care in our business, except Hollywood?

Never stopped being amazed that Actors fighting could afford to dance so
much. Takes hell of energy, not to speak of the vulnerablilty involved.

> Too true. Even if I *did* live 400 years, I doubt I could come
> up with half the stuff that got cooked up in Japan's "Warring States"
> period purely out of necessity. Trust the experience of those who went
> before you and you can outlearn your lifetime.

Like the

when-you-know-the-accepted-methods-by-heart-then-you-can-begin-outdoing-them

Princip?
Works fine for me :-)

--
Regards,

Silhouette
___________
___________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Helge Diernaes | "I'm going slightly mad..."
ecocide@***.cbs.dk | Freddy Mercury, Queen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
-----------
Message no. 2
From: The Digital Mage <mn3rge@****.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Really old fighters are good.
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 14:03:50 +0000
On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, Helge Diernaes wrote:

> In escrima II - Philipine Stickfighting - the average combat until one is
> immobilised lasts max 10 secs when the parties get down to business.
> It ain't flashy - but who care in our business, except Hollywood?
Just out of interest I'm probably going to be adding Escrima rules to my
Martial arts list. :)


The Digital Mage : mn3rge@****.ac.uk
Shadowrun Web Site under construction at
http://www.bath.ac.uk/~mn3rge/Shadowrun.html
Message no. 3
From: Helge Diernaes <ecocide@***.CBS.DK>
Subject: Re: Really old fighters are good.
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 18:43:29 +0100
On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, The Digital Mage wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, Helge Diernaes wrote:
>
> > In escrima II - Philipine Stickfighting - the average combat until one is
> > immobilised lasts max 10 secs when the parties get down to business.
> > It ain't flashy - but who care in our business, except Hollywood?
> Just out of interest I'm probably going to be adding Escrima rules to my
> Martial arts list. :)

Cool. Please make it violent :-)

--
Regards,

Sil

___________
___________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Helge Diernaes | "I'm going slightly mad..."
ecocide@***.cbs.dk | Freddy Mercury, Queen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
-----------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Really old fighters are good., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.