From: | Malcolm Shaw <malhms@*********.COM.AU> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Sat, 24 Oct 1998 02:27:00 +1000 |
their choosen trasition?? I am mot clear what this means. Is a conjurer
an aspected magician?.
From: | Malcolm Shaw <malhms@*********.COM.AU> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Sat, 24 Oct 1998 02:27:00 +1000 |
From: | Slipspeed <atreloar@*********.COM> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Sat, 24 Oct 1998 02:47:13 +1000 |
From: | Lehlan Decker <DeckerL@******.COM> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Fri, 23 Oct 1998 12:44:43 -0400 |
From: | Shaun Gilroy <shaung@**********.NET> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Fri, 23 Oct 1998 12:44:32 -0400 |
From: | Fixer <fixer@*******.TLH.FL.US> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Fri, 23 Oct 1998 13:17:11 -0400 |
From: | Steve Eley <sfeley@***.NET> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Fri, 23 Oct 1998 14:17:23 -0400 |
From: | Mike Bobroff <Airwasp@***.COM> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Fri, 23 Oct 1998 15:52:23 EDT |
From: | K in the Shadows <Ereskanti@***.COM> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Fri, 23 Oct 1998 16:13:27 EDT |
From: | Sean McCrohan <mccrohan@*****.OIT.GATECH.EDU> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Fri, 23 Oct 1998 15:57:44 -0400 |
From: | Gurth <gurth@******.NL> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Sat, 24 Oct 1998 12:41:44 +0200 |
From: | Steadfast <laughingman@*******.DE> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Sat, 24 Oct 1998 23:40:48 +0200 |
From: | Malcolm Shaw <malhms@*********.COM.AU> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re Aspected Magicians |
Date: | Mon, 26 Oct 1998 12:16:45 +1100 |
If you enjoyed reading about Re Aspected Magicians, you may also be interested in:
These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.