Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Redundantly Stupid threads (was Re: New SR E-mag)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 21:35:53 -0500
>Please guys, this is running round and round and round and... well, you
>get the point. Take it to private mail or... I'll start up the Grounding
>debate with Georg ;)
>
Or, just maybe, I'll start talking about FAB, or Woodchucks, or ask someone
which is better, a Sammy or Phys-Ad...:):):)

<grin>

Bull
Message no. 2
From: Brian W Allison <ballison@*******.WAM.UMD.EDU>
Subject: Re: Redundantly Stupid threads (was Re: New SR E-mag)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 21:32:30 -0500
On Mon, 2 Dec 1996, Bull wrote:

> Or, just maybe, I'll start talking about FAB, or Woodchucks, or ask someone
> which is better, a Sammy or Phys-Ad...:):):)


Hm. Can you ground through a Quickened Woodchuck with a FAB-spell?







Brian W. Allison

Computer Scientist Vocalist Would-be Poet Bicycler Scuba Diver
Hacker(0xca) Nerd(79) GenX(21) #include <witticism.h>
http://www.wam.umd.edu/~ballison

--- Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail is not welcome at this account ---
--- and will result in a US$500 fee per US Code Title 47 Sec 227. ---
Message no. 3
From: The Jestyr <jestyr@*******.DIALIX.COM.AU>
Subject: Re: Redundantly Stupid threads (was Re: New SR E-mag)
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 15:08:25 +1100
> > Or, just maybe, I'll start talking about FAB, or Woodchucks, or ask someone
> > which is better, a Sammy or Phys-Ad...:):):)
>
> Hm. Can you ground through a Quickened Woodchuck with a FAB-spell?

Only if the woodchuck's a sammy - phys-ads are too good to be grounded
through. :) <ducking and running>

Lady Jestyr

--------------------------------------------------
A titanic intellect... in a world full of icebergs
--------------------------------------------------
Elle Holmes jestyr@*******.dialix.oz.au
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1503
--------------------------------------------------
Message no. 4
From: hardware@*******.DATANET.AB.CA
Subject: Re: Redundantly Stupid threads (was Re: New SR E-mag)
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 21:33:02 +0000
> Or, just maybe, I'll start talking about FAB, or Woodchucks, or ask someone
> which is better, a Sammy or Phys-Ad...:):):)
>
> <grin>
>
> Bull
>

A Woodchuck Adept is the best of course
Message no. 5
From: Mark McLaughlin <mmclaugh@*******.EENG.DCU.IE>
Subject: Re: Redundantly Stupid threads (was Re: New SR E-mag)
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 12:14:32 -0800
Bull wrote:
>
> >Please guys, this is running round and round and round and... well, you
> >get the point. Take it to private mail or... I'll start up the Grounding
> >debate with Georg ;)
> >
> Or, just maybe, I'll start talking about FAB, or Woodchucks, or ask someone
> which is better, a Sammy or Phys-Ad...:):):)
>
> <grin>
>
> Bull

Yea, and skip the DOS/WINDOWS crap this is supposed to be an SR mailing
list. And enough about assault cannons already!! And all because some
new just happened to say that PACS were too good!!! BAD MOVE

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Redundantly Stupid threads (was Re: New SR E-mag), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!