Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Reply and Request to Admin (Re: Rigger Book 2)
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 07:56:18 EST
In a message dated 97-12-24 06:40:04 EST, chaos@*****.COM writes:

> >Yup, and I know what word goes after the "Bull"...
> >
> In RL it's Ratkovich. in SR is MacAllistar. In your world, I REALLY hope
> the name Bull isn;t used at all... I'd feel... tainted... Somehow...:/

Hey Bull, I know some good soap that may help. If that's not enough, see the
following end...

> >Actually, I count everyone who has to change rules they either don't
> >understand or have to change for whatever reason the munchkins. Which
puts
> >you where??? OZ??

Actually Ivy, you aren't using the rules as they stand. I sat down and did
something just for the fun of it(hey, it only took me about 3 minutes tops).
karma award you were mentioning earlier. You know what. You broke the rules.
I won't tell you where because you obviously don't give a shit.

-=-=-=-=-=-

Dear Fro and/or Dvixen....(especially Fro)

I realize that I once wrote Fro a letter concerning everyone's attitudes and
and he and I had a couple of replies (nice one's even). In that letter I
mentioned something about "everyone needed an opinion" or some such
phrasement. However, I think I have found an exception (Hey, there is
-Always- the exception, as Gamers we know that possibly better than anyone
else on Earth ;).

Please "Kill" Ivy...I normally, like Bull, can be fairly easy-going (even if I
am rude from time to time). Easy going enough that I can afford the luxury of
never killfiling anyone (and yes, I finally know how even on AOL). But this
has gone beyond the ridiculous. So if you could, please...????

-K

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Reply and Request to Admin (Re: Rigger Book 2), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.