Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Michael Ford <fordmd@*******.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
Subject: reply on cyber-psychosis
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 92 16:09:06 EST
Hoi All,

The one problem with using this cyber psycosisis that the game
cyberpunk uses a rating Shadowrun does not have which is empathy. And
simply stated empathy is emotional related how you deal with interaction
and your own emotions. In cyberpunk you can have a 10 to 0(0 only in empathy
all other scores must be above 0) with a 10 being a highly emotional
and characters with a zero are usually cold fish who prefer computers
as company than humans. If some one does get cyber psychosis to an extreme a
friendly person with a 0 you are a cold fish and prefer computers to humans.
If youdo reach zero and you go cyber-psycho they call out this specialized
police force called the cyber-psycho squad to terminate the person (they
get really big guns and they seem to be almost cyber-psycho them selves)
Now here is the problem as I see it I always felt essence was a body related
attribute and not a mental one. I have read the books and people with
alot of cyberware are not described as having the above problems. Which
points that essenceis a body thing and not a mental one. Then again I could

--
******************************************************************************
* The central truth is that there are no central truths, it's all chaos and *
* we spend our lives figuring out how to deal with it. Some deny it, some *
* build structures to contain it or bridges to cross it. But until you look *
* into the abyss you don't know who you really are. *
* Me I just live in the Chaos. *
* --Wolfgang Kies-- *
******************************************************************************

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about reply on cyber-psychosis, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.