Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: DV82REL8 <GRAFF85@********.CORTLAND.EDU>
Subject: Restraints
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1993 11:53:37 -0400
> After some thinking, we decided that the "competent" decker was not the
indica
>ted person for the job (what do you expect from a troll decker?), so i had the
>folowing idea:
>1- We levitate her
>2- We get the monowhip (Mr. Johnson had put the material at the hotel prior to
>our arrival)
>3- Lola uses the monowhip WITH CARE (we didn't wanted her to get hurt! :) )
>4- Lola cuts a slice from the bracelet.
>5- The bracelet stops functioning, but it doesn't discharges a the shock, as sh
>e is floating in the air.
> Does someone has an answer?
> Fahnuir

Ok What you are suggesting is totally ludicris. One if you think about it
there would probably not be only one part to the restraint. If they are
creative they would have used *2* bracelets that would discharge *across* the
person causing a serious shock throught the heart. One bracelet to ground
would have little or no effect. If she was in air it would probably work...
provided they had deckers designing it (you racist) while they were on Zen or
some other freebased drug.

So either way I think that most of the designers would have thought of every
contingency.

And don't go knocking troll deckers!!!!

-Head Case
Message no. 2
From: Fahnuir <FAHNUIR@******.BITNET>
Subject: Restraints
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1993 16:58:26 PRT
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>Ok What you are suggesting is totally ludicris. One if you think about it
>there would probably not be only one part to the restraint. If they are
>creative they would have used *2* bracelets that would discharge *across* the
>person causing a serious shock throught the heart. One bracelet to ground
>would have little or no effect. If she was in air it would probably work...
>provided they had deckers designing it (you racist) while they were on Zen or
>some other freebased drug.
>
>So either way I think that most of the designers would have thought of every
>contingency.
>
>And don't go knocking troll deckers!!!!
>
>-Head Case

Thank you for your answer ( i liked the use of the word 'lidricis'. It's mo
re soft than the word 'idiot' or 'ridiculous'.
You're right! It the sugestion was lidricis (i love this word).

By the way; i'm not racist. In fact almost all af my characters are Metahuman
s Rights Activists (I liked that Troll decker!)


In your room, i feel you and i just can't get enough...
Judas
Message no. 3
From: The Deb Decker <RJR96326@****.UTULSA.EDU>
Subject: Re: Restraints
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1993 17:26:22 GMT
> Thank you for your answer ( i liked the use of the word 'lidricis'. It's mo
>re soft than the word 'idiot' or 'ridiculous'.
> You're right! It the sugestion was lidricis (i love this word).

Ludicrous is even better.

Another asepct of the restraints is that they're likely set to discharge
if disturbed in such a crude fashion as being cut with a monowhip. An
Electronics B/R roll is order, and would require at least some basic
tools.


J Roberson

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Restraints, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!