Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: David Hayes <rook@***.NET>
Subject: returning mail
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 05:32:37 -0800
hmmm, is it just me or is everyone getting denied from the new list
right now??
all my mail to it is being returned. i get this message:

>Unable to deliver to destination domain
>Cannot resolve lists.html.com

anbody else??


-----------------------------------------------
k. david hayes aka rook
rook@***.net
http://www.members.cnx.net/rook/
-----------------------------------------------
managing editor
ouc phoenix, kelowna b.c.
phoenix@******.okanagan.bc.ca
-----------------------------------------------
Message no. 2
From: Jill <jmenning@*****.EDU>
Subject: Re: returning mail
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 07:21:36 -0700
Yup, getting "Returned Mail" notice on everything I try to send to the
new list. I'm getting the messages all right, but...

Jill
Message no. 3
From: Adam J <adamj@*********.HTML.COM>
Subject: Re: returning mail
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 07:30:30 -0700
At 07:21 2/2/99 -0700, Jill wrote:
>Yup, getting "Returned Mail" notice on everything I try to send to the
>new list. I'm getting the messages all right, but...

My last post generated no such thing. There's obviously still some bugs to
work out :/

-Adam
Message no. 4
From: CASTELLI David <d.castelli@**************.FR>
Subject: Re: returning mail
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 15:31:09 +0100
> Yup, getting "Returned Mail" notice on everything I try to send to the
> new list. I'm getting the messages all right, but...
>
> Jill
>
>
Grrrrr.... i still can't join...
Host unknown !!!!

David CASTELLI

AKA d.castelli@**************.fr

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about returning mail, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!