Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: Review of NAGEE 5
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 1994 19:50:32 -0500
Here's a quick review of NAGEE 5.
All is IMnsHO, of course.

First, I was rather let down by the size. NAGEEs 1-4 averaged about
sixty pages, with their size gradually increasing. #5 is only 48 pages
long.

It does start out with a nice, full colour cover page, with an absolutely
great Matrix-painting by Karen Weatherbee, but from there it begins to go
down hill.

NAGEE is no longer edited by Jerry Stratton, but is now edited by Tony
Moller. I suppose like many people, Jerry passed the torch due to lack
of time, and when I was asked to edit NAGEE, I passed for the same
reason. Tony does do a very good job, and I don't fault him for the
drawbacks in this issue. I think it's pretty evident that the available
materials were pretty sparse. Hopefully NAGEE 6 will improve in that
area.

After the standard 'Bulletin Board' section, NAGEE 5 begins with a
two-page review of the Germany Sourcebook. Next comes the first in a
series of short stories by Tom Down called 'Wyrm Talk'.

After Dowd's work, we get a five-page review of the city of Las Vegas in
205x. While not up to the verbosity of Pueblo in NAGEE 4, it is quite
well done and I enjoy seeing cities written up that FASA chooses to
ignore.

Next is another short story, followed by a listing of recent and future
FASA releases. It's interesting to note that in September, FASA plans
'Prime Runners', a book of NPCs. This will come about 4 months after a
NERPS release of the same topic (NERPS: Who? What? Where?).

Next is an integrated system for multiple datajacks designed for use with
the expert system rules from NAGEE 4 witten by yours truely. It's
interesting to note that I submitted this at the same time as my writeup
with Vincent Esposito on multi-tasking, but when it didn't appear in
NAGEE 4, assumed it was rejected, and this both this article and a reprint
of the multi-tasking rules appears in the recently released NERPS ShadowLore.

Next we enter 'The Meat Market', and are given a couple of archtypes and
another section listing several deckers of varying ability.

Four new decking utilities appear on page 34, followed by 'The Spirit
Guide', which gives us the Horse and Dove Totem. Incidently, Dove also
appears in NERPS ShadowLore.

Next is a nice writeup that tablizes all the accessories that come free
with your favorite weapons.

Page 41 brings us rewites of the archetypes in NAGEE 1, to make the
compatible with Second Edition.

Finally, we get a chapter that brings us eleven new spells to make things
interesting for your magic-bored runners.


Of course, I recommend that everyone get this tome, and despite my
criticisms, I think it is an admirable production. There is such a lack
of non-FA$A material that it is nice to see things happening. It's my
hope that future versions of NAGEE are larger and better and I look
forward to them.

NAGEE 5 (and previous versions) is available for anonymous FTP at
teetot.acusd.edu:/pub/Beelzebub/Role-Playing/Shadowrun/NAGEE. It is
available in PostScript, ASCII, RTF and MS Word formats.




____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> Political Correctness is
\/ Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> P.C. for "Thought Police"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GAT d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)
Message no. 2
From: Hal Mangold <hmangold@*******.AC.RUNET.EDU>
Subject: Review of NAGEE 5 (fwd)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 1994 21:38:39 EDT
Forwarded message:
>
> NAGEE 5 (and previous versions) is available for anonymous FTP at
> teetot.acusd.edu:/pub/Beelzebub/Role-Playing/Shadowrun/NAGEE. It is
> available in PostScript, ASCII, RTF and MS Word formats.

Hmmm...just went poking around in teetot and saw no sign of this. Whats
the deal? (BTW I checked incoming as well as the Shadowrun section)


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hal Mangold >> hmangold@*******.ac.runet.edu >>"Patience is like
bread
Savage Henry >> Radford University,Radford Va.>> they say,I ran out of
SvgeHenry@***.com >> Apathy capitol of the USA >> that yesterday....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Geek code under construction.
Message no. 3
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: Re: Review of NAGEE 5 (fwd)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 1994 21:00:36 -0500
On Sun, 17 Apr 1994, Hal Mangold wrote:

> Hmmm...just went poking around in teetot and saw no sign of this. Whats
> the deal? (BTW I checked incoming as well as the Shadowrun section)

I just checked, everything is in:
teetot.acusd.edu :/pub/Beelzebub/Role-Playing/Shadowrun/NAGEE

*shrug*


____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> Political Correctness is
\/ Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> P.C. for "Thought Police"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GAT d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)
Message no. 4
From: Timothy Skirvin <tskirvin@********.UNI.UIUC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Review of NAGEE 5 (fwd)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 1994 21:35:02 -0500
> Hmmm...just went poking around in teetot and saw no sign of this.
> Whats the deal? (BTW I checked incoming as well as the Shadowrun
> section)

I just picked me up a copy. It's siting on my account (which isn't
really good). It's there.

----------------------- "Well, you see, they took the Bible literally.
Tim Skirvin Adam and Eve, the snake and the apple...took
(tskirvin@ it word for word. Unfortunately, their
superdec.uni.uiuc.edu) version had a misprint."
----------------------- - Rimmer, Red Dwarf (The Last Day)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Review of NAGEE 5, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.