Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Jason Carter, Nightstalker" <CARTER@***.EDU>
Subject: RE: Rev's comments on my comments.
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 93 23:26:31 CET
The Rev said:
>>The problem is what happens after rolling down the damage.
>>Say I hit the person with 8 successes with my Predator2. They roll 2
successes,
>>thereby giving me a net of 6 successes. That equivalates to a 9(d+1). Which,
>>in SR2, drops to a deadly. Let's say the guy has a 6 body, with an armored
>>longcoat. He now has to roll (9-4)=5s. Odds are he'll roll 2. That puts him
>>down to a serious. It doesn't matter if I had gotten a D++++, or a D. Under
>>vanilla SR2, he would have taken a S. With the variant rule, he would've had
>>to roll down a 9(d+1)D, needing a 6 (11-5). Odds are he only rolls one, and
>>down he falls. There IS a difference, a crucial one, when you are doing above
>>deadly damamge.
Wrong Rev,
I believe your saying the target rolled 2 successes with his combat pool and
two successes with body. Since the 2 combat pool successes where not enough to
make the attack miss him, roll his body dice and add that to the combat pool
successes. Since he got 2 successes that's 4 successes for Mr. target.
Now your rolled 8 successes and the target rolled 4 successes. That gives you
4 Net Success. That stages the damage up two levels from M to D. Your target
takes 10 boxes of damage and promptly drops to the ground.
Now I don't mean this as an insult, but go back and carefully reread the SRII
section on combat. What I'm saying is right in there.

See ya in Shadows,
Jason J Carter
The Nightstalker

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Rev's comments on my comments., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.