Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Rules and the game world (was Re: [OT] Cyberpunk 3rd edition?)
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:37:39 +0100
According to Paul Squires, on 2-2-06 11:09 the word on the street was...

> I've often argued this point. Starting from a pure game mechanics view
> - if a task is easier then it is more likely to be attempted and this
> can have a knock-on effect even at simple levels such as "how far can
> I leap?"

"I'm a 17th-level fighter with 153 hit points -- I know, I'll jump down
the Grand Canyon ..." ;)

> I recall playing SR1 and encountering that situation (this
> was before we had the concept of legality in the game). WFRP has the
> same with the naked dwarf syndrome - unarmoured, but tough, characters
> have a pretty good chance of surviving anything /normal/ that is
> thrown at them. This does not a grim, perilous, world make. CP2020 -
> when I first played it - inspired absolute fear about combat - one
> lucky shot WILL kill.

SR hangs somewhere in the middle, I think. Certainly in SRII and SR3,
unarmored characters could take a lot of damage from almost any attack,
but as soon as you add decent armor, the danger dropped noticeably --
leading to a more cinematic style of game than if you limit armor for
whatever reason.

--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Years come three for the price of one.
-> Former NAGEE Editor & ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Site: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UB+ P(+) L++ E W++(--) N o? K w-- O
M+ PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Rules and the game world (was Re: [OT] Cyberpunk 3rd edition?), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.