Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Da Twink Daddy <twinkie@*******.DMSC.K12.AR.US>
Subject: Rules question: Barrier spells
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 09:06:25 -0600
-----Original Message-----
From: Fade <runefo@***.UIO.NO>

>> >I also assume barriers do not move with the caster.
>>
>> IMO, they do. If you think that a detection spell with area effect moves
>> with the caster, I think it's the same with manip spells. Since it isn't
>> stated anywhere, I think all spell types functions the same way regarding
>> area effect.

>The detection spells in question is the so-called 'hypersense'
>spells, which is a special case. It would be very unwise to assume
>all spells in general work as special case spells.

<snip: x-cellent counterpoint>

I agree, hypersense is a special case, the target is actually the caster,
not the AoE.

>And barrier is, obviously, not a hypersense spell.


Agreed.

>The Barrier spell does not state that it is treated differently
>wether the caster is inside or outside the area of effect, neither
>does it cover any of the numerous questions about what would happen
>if a barrier's movement was blocked.

>Examining the data so far, despite the fact that most said, 'sure, it
>moves with the caster', I have not seen a good reason to change my
>assumption that it does not move.

Agreed, I would have at first said, sure it'll move. But, in the spell
description it doesn't mention any movement capabilities. I mean if It could
move, how fast? Could you use it as a battering ram? Or simply to crush
someone?

>About LOS:
>Reading the book, it only states that concentration is required.
>When more than a few has said LOS is not required, I am inclined to
>agree. That implies sustaining a spell and quickening a spell is two
>very similar processes, incidentally.


Yes, AFAIAC, LOS is not required for sustaining a spell, nor should be.

>About personal barriers:
>The only description of the 'personal' effect I remember reading is
>in the grimoire, in spell design, where it states that if a spell has
>the 'personal' modification, it is considered cast at the caster, and
>thus modifiers for voluntary target, touch or limited range e etc. is
>inappliccable. I have not been able to find - anywhere - something
>that says this changes the way the spell basically works. So I am
>still very curious *where* it says that personal barrier spells are
>'body armor'. I have assumed this for a long time, but then I got a
>bad case of doubt, which made me ask. And while many have said that
>'Mike says it works that way', it appears Mike is going by his own
>rules in a number of questions and isn't entirely official. Also,
>since a 'body armor' version of the barrier spell would be very
>different from the original spell, it should have a little more of a
>description than
>'Personal: F/2+1M Drain.'

Right, in theory, technically if you read the description, barrier doesn't
_have_ a target. So, I would rule that it can't be made personal. I hate to
throw out parts of sourcebooks like that, but I'm sitting here reading the
desc. of barrier and there is absolutely _no_ mention of a target.

If a player wanted to design a spell that worked simialr to the personal
barrier spell. It's just be a "simple" spell that simple took a target
(prob. willing) and created a barrier that surrounded his/her aura and moved
etc. with him.

It does say that the caster can make a "wall" yet, that it can be of any
shape. Being able to _change_ the shape of the spell (after casting) would
require an additional increase in drain. IMO. It does say that it is
cumulative with armor however, I think this is refering to another rule in
the combat section that says that you subtract the rating of any barrier in
front of you _and_ your armor. Specifically mentioned, I believe, becasue it
is considered an exception of "armor" doesn't stack.

If the caster wanted to create a "wall" the conformed to a persons
"shape"
at the time of casting, I would allow that, however, it still wouldn't move,
asnd that person still wouldn't be considered a target, and they would
effectively be held in place. (with a hefty penalty to get out cause the
can't get any leverage or velocity behind thier struggle. (They can't move
at all.)

Yes, this means all those locked/quickened/sustained barriers aren't extra
armor at all times. The caster has just decied to "permanently" imprision
himself.

Da Twink Daddy ( twinkie@*******.dmsc.k12.ar.us gilmeth@*********.com
UIN:514984)
----------
"Don't hit me!! I'm in the Twilight Zone!!!" --Zippy the Pinhead
----------
http://vancove.dmsc.k12.ar.us/~twinkie/
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/3759/
Message no. 2
From: losthalo <losthalo@********.COM>
Subject: Re: Rules question: Barrier spells
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 17:52:33 -0500
At 09:06 AM 3/2/98 -0600, you wrote:

>Agreed, I would have at first said, sure it'll move. But, in the spell
>description it doesn't mention any movement capabilities. I mean if It could
>move, how fast? Could you use it as a battering ram? Or simply to crush
>someone?

>Right, in theory, technically if you read the description, barrier doesn't
>_have_ a target. So, I would rule that it can't be made personal. I hate to
>throw out parts of sourcebooks like that, but I'm sitting here reading the
>desc. of barrier and there is absolutely _no_ mention of a target.
>
Well, as to whether it moves, my reasoning runs thus: does the spell
description mention a target? If the spell is targeted -on- something,
then it would probably move with the target. However, and I think this is
the case, if it is cast on an -area-, then it should sit at that location,
period.

losthalo

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Rules question: Barrier spells, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.