Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: jt_mcmurray@*******.com (James McMurray)
Subject: Run reference
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:02:16 -0600
I'm looking for a run that involves an extraction, preferably online. I
probably won't be using the adventure itself, but would like to peruse it.

Thanks!
Message no. 2
From: dandrews67@*****.com (Donald Andrews)
Subject: Run reference
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:18:59 -0800 (PST)
If you have access to "Wake of the Comet" there is an
extraction run in it. If you do not have access to it
drop me an E-mail ( dandrews67@*****.com ) and I'll
see what I can do for you.

--- James McMurray <jt_mcmurray@*******.com> wrote:

> I'm looking for a run that involves an extraction,
> preferably online. I
> probably won't be using the adventure itself, but
> would like to peruse it.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Message no. 3
From: jt_mcmurray@*******.com (James McMurray)
Subject: Run reference
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 09:10:31 -0600
>From: Donald Andrews <dandrews67@*****.com>
>Reply-To: Shadowrun Discussion <shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com>
>To: Shadowrun Discussion <shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com>
>Subject: Re: Run reference
>Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:18:59 -0800 (PST)
>
>If you have access to "Wake of the Comet" there is an
>extraction run in it. If you do not have access to it
>drop me an E-mail ( dandrews67@*****.com ) and I'll
>see what I can do for you.

Thanks! Its one of the many 3e books I've picked up but not had a chance to
read yet.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Run reference, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.