Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Paul Jonathan Adam <Paul@********.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Searches
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 1995 23:56:05 GMT
> > Finally, the concealability issue. Think about the situation. A decent
> > pat-down will uncover even a light pistol in real life.
> Yep, concealability ratings are only for observation purposes.
> A frisking will always reveal concealed weapons, unless they are so small or
> so unweaponlike that you would recongnise them even if they looked you in the
> face.

Depends... A lot of traditional pat-downs are "armpit to knee" searches. I
was checked for weapons by the US Army once and they missed a 5-inch lock-
knife in my pocket. Good places to holster weapons are inside the ankle,
small of the back, crotch rig... All available in the Uncle Mike's and
Bianchi catalogues. A Glock 23 is a dinky little weapon: but it fires
twelve rounds of .40S&W very accurately. (My Glock 21 is a brute and not
easy to hide at all, and as for something like a Desert Eagle...)

It depends on how thorough the searchers are, what happens if they find
a weapon (paperwork? a fight? rewards and bonuses?) and many other
factors. One friend had a .45 automatic and four spare clips missed simply
because he was symetrical (gun on one hip, magazines on the other: he
just seemed portly to a fast pat-down).

--
When you have shot and killed a man, you have defined your attitude towards
him. You have offered a definite answer to a definite problem. For better
or for worse, you have acted decisively.
In fact, the next move is up to him.

Paul J. Adam paul@********.demon.co.uk

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Searches, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.