Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: _hEx_ iti03678@****.co.za
Subject: Seattle LTG and Renraku
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:00:37 +0200
As far as Corporate Download is concerned, Renraku still maintains
SeaSpace, the Seattle public LTG. Is this system run from the
Arcology? In that case, is data being sent over the Seattle LTG safe
from the clutches of the big bad Arcology Expert System? Is it likely
that Renraku will lose the contract to maintain the LTG if they don't
get the Arcology under control very soon. Any thoughts on this matter
would be appreciated.

<hex@*************.com>
bad luck
Message no. 2
From: TheGreat Zaius dr.zaius@*******.com
Subject: Seattle LTG and Renraku
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:22:13 -0800
>As far as Corporate Download is concerned, Renraku still maintains
>SeaSpace, the Seattle public LTG. Is this system run from the
>Arcology?
<snip>
No, it';s ran from a shell company near by if I member right

>In that case, is data being sent over the Seattle LTG safe
>from the clutches of the big bad Arcology Expert System? Is it likely
>that Renraku will lose the contract to maintain the LTG if they don't
>get the Arcology under control very soon. Any thoughts on this matter
>would be appreciated.
<snip>

No, The arcology AI is like a dragon persay, it iknows about everything that goes on. It
has johnsons and almost anything else..it's a corp in one unit, it runs things more
effeciantly..so I took over the building and reaked havok. They have currently gotten
control over four more floors and still are working to get control over more.

Dr.Zaius



------------------------------------------------------------
Free Email @ YourMom.com!
http://www.yourmom.com/

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Seattle LTG and Renraku, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.