Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Mercenary X <kdye@*****.STANFORD.EDU>
Subject: Seattle Tech
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 1994 15:57:54 -0700
Seattle Tech is the name of my Shadowrun file compilation. It is
10 megs of Text and GIFs all related to shadowrun. Some is origamnal,
some from AOL, the net and other things. I am thinking of uploading to
cerebus, but I am not sure, would you guys be interested if I did?

PS: This is huge, it includes all the NAGEEs and NERPS. so beware.


\ /
M E R C E N A R Y X
/ \ kdye@*****.stanford.edu
Message no. 2
From: Damion Milliken <u9467882@******.UOW.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 1994 16:17:35 +0000
MercenaryX writes:

> Seattle Tech is the name of my Shadowrun file compilation. It is
> 10 megs of Text and GIFs all related to shadowrun. Some is origamnal,
> some from AOL, the net and other things. I am thinking of uploading to
> cerebus, but I am not sure, would you guys be interested if I did?
>
> PS: This is huge, it includes all the NAGEEs and NERPS. so beware.

Er, I'd like to see it, but perhaps the stuff already on cerebus etc could be
left out?

--
Damion Milliken University of Wollongong E-Mail: u9467882@******.uow.edu.au

(Geek Code 2.1) GE d@ H s++:-- !g p? !au a18 w+ v C+ U P? !L !3 E? N K- W+ M
!V po@ Y t(+) !5 !j r+(++) G(+) !tv(--) b++ D+ B? e+ u@ h+(*)
f+@ !r n--(----)@ !y+
Message no. 3
From: Marc A Renouf <jormung@*****.UMICH.EDU>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 1994 16:49:25 -0400
Mercenary X (kdye) writes: [something about putting 10 M of stuff on the
net.]

That's not necessary. If it already includes all the stuff from
NERPS and NAGEE, it's thoroughly redundant, and therefore a waste of
space. However, I recommend wholeheartedly that you do post your orignal
stuff, since many of us have probably not seen it. Some of the net stuff
from AOL might be cool too, but try to avoid large scale repetition.

Marc
Message no. 4
From: Matt <mosbun@******.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 1994 15:59:14 -0500
And since the subject seems to have popped up, could someone please send me
a list of Shadowrun FTP and WWW sites? I seem to have lost my list. Thanx.

Matt
Message no. 5
From: Mercenary X <kdye@*****.STANFORD.EDU>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 1994 13:59:08 -0700
On Sat, 20 Aug 1994, Marc A Renouf wrote:

> Mercenary X (kdye) writes: [something about putting 10 M of stuff on the
> net.]
>
> That's not necessary. If it already includes all the stuff from
> NERPS and NAGEE, it's thoroughly redundant, and therefore a waste of
> space. However, I recommend wholeheartedly that you do post your orignal
> stuff, since many of us have probably not seen it. Some of the net stuff
> from AOL might be cool too, but try to avoid large scale repetition.
>
> Marc
>

OK, I took out the repetitous stuff and cut it down to 5 megabytes of
text, some origanal, some from AOL, Its more than Marcucci has for sure
Message no. 6
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@****.CAIS.COM>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 1994 22:54:56 -0400
On Fri, 19 Aug 1994, Mercenary X wrote:

> Seattle Tech is the name of my Shadowrun file compilation. It is
> 10 megs of Text and GIFs all related to shadowrun. Some is origamnal,
> some from AOL, the net and other things. I am thinking of uploading to
> cerebus, but I am not sure, would you guys be interested if I did?
>
> PS: This is huge, it includes all the NAGEEs and NERPS. so beware.
>
Please remove any and all of my NERPS submissions (I have made no
submissions to NAGEE.) I have not given you permission to use them -- you
didn't even ask me.
Message no. 7
From: Will Cottrell <UGCOTTRE@******.BITNET>
Subject: Seattle Tech
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 1994 19:11:27 EDT
Well folks, it was good while it lasted. (I guess)
I just came from cerebus (via gopher) and having explored the entire
incoming diectory I found only the remnants of directory upon directory.
The files that had at once been there have now been deleted...

A moment of silence?






That's enough! We don't want to get too mooshy. :-)

Will
Message no. 8
From: Nightfox <DJWA@******.UCC.NAU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 1994 20:53:16 -0700
Ok - for those coming back from a summer hiatus

WHAT THE HECK IS SEATTLE TECH!!!!!

Nightfox

BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!
Daniel Waisley + SCA - March of Ered Sul - Flagstaff AZ
DJWA@******.UCC.NAU.EDU + Nau fencing club.
"Nightfox" + Brotherhood of the Cryptic Demesne -household
BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!
GE - d+(-) -p+@ c++(++++) !L u(--) e+(*) m+ s+/ !n+(-) h* f+ g+ w+++ t+ r+ y+
"infinity = zero" - Daniel Waisley "Nightfox"
BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!
Message no. 9
From: Will Cottrell <UGCOTTRE@******.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 1994 11:12:27 EDT
On Thurs, 1 Sept, Nightfox wrote:

> Ok - for those coming back from a summer hiatus
>
> WHAT THE HECK IS SEATTLE TECH!!!!!
>
> Nightfox

Seattle Tech was a group of (SR)files that Mercenary X had collected and
downloaded to Cerebus about a week ago. The problem is that the files
were deleted from Cerebus before many could get a chance to use/view
them- myself included.

I believe I'm going to be asking for a semi-large group of people when I
ask this: Mercenary X, could you please download your Seattle Tech files
to cerebus again or post where else we could peruse them? :-)

Will
Message no. 10
From: Mercenary X <kdye@*****.STANFORD.EDU>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 1994 13:05:32 -0700
On Thu, 1 Sep 1994, Will Cottrell wrote:

> On Thurs, 1 Sept, Nightfox wrote:
>
> > Ok - for those coming back from a summer hiatus
> >
> > WHAT THE HECK IS SEATTLE TECH!!!!!
> >
> > Nightfox
>
> Seattle Tech was a group of (SR)files that Mercenary X had collected and
> downloaded to Cerebus about a week ago. The problem is that the files
> were deleted from Cerebus before many could get a chance to use/view
> them- myself included.
>
> I believe I'm going to be asking for a semi-large group of people when I
> ask this: Mercenary X, could you please download your Seattle Tech files
> to cerebus again or post where else we could peruse them? :-)

I will talk to the owner of the stanford site berea.stanford.edu
(My father) and ask if I can upload there, then you could ftp there
whenever you wanted to grab some files.
Message no. 11
From: Will Cottrell <UGCOTTRE@******.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 1994 20:01:13 EDT
>> Me:
>> Mercenary X, could you please download your Seattle Tech files
>> to cerebus again or post where else we could peruse them? :-)

> Mercenary X:
> I will talk to the owner of the stanford site berea.stanford.edu
> (My father) and ask if I can upload there, then you could ftp there
> whenever you wanted to grab some files.

Great! If all goes well, please tell us when it's ready?
Will
Message no. 12
From: MILLIKEN DAMION A <u9467882@***.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 1994 20:43:14 +1000
Um, not wanting to seem likea dill or anything, but, MercX, what's a .bin
file? I can't make head nor tail of it.

--
Damion Milliken University of Wollongong e-mail: u9467882@***.edu.au

(GEEK CODE 2.1) GE -d+(d) H s++:-- !g p? !au a18 w+ v(?) C+(++) US++ P? L !3 E?
N K- W+ M@ !V po@ Y(+) t+ !5 !j R+(++) G(+) !tv(--)@ b++ D+ B?
e+ u@ h* f(+) !r n--(----) !y+
Message no. 13
From: willemj <willemj@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 1994 16:28:09 +0200
Dear Mercenary X
How do I extract the ST Files? I really don't get it!
Thanks for your patience!
Message no. 14
From: Mercenary X <kdye@*****.STANFORD.EDU>
Subject: Re: Seattle Tech
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 1994 17:07:07 -0700
If your on a mac, gat a program called struffit expander. I
don'yt know of a program on a PC that extracts .sit files.


__ __
\ \ / /
\ \/ /
M E R C E N A R Y
/ /\ \ kdye@*****.stanford.edu
/ / \ \
^^ ^^

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Seattle Tech, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.