Message no. 1

From:	Ferri_Pagano_at_STRM__Amsterdam1@******.com
Subject:	Re[2]: Security Tally (was Otakus) [f]
Date:	Thu, 26 Sep 96 12:51:20 EST

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Security Tally (was Otakus)
Author: shadowrn@********.itribe.net at Internet
Date: 24-9-96 12:43


Ferri_Pagano_at_STRM__Amsterdam1@******.com wrote:
|
|%Ferri_Pagano_at_STRM__Amsterdam1@******.com wrote: | | |
|%Am I the only one
|%that noticed that in vr2.0 gray ice is almost useless? |it's just too
|%easy to resist. |
|%| Ferri | | |
|
|%So put a host with grey IC in front of the secure host with black IC.
|%The decker will run up his security tally dealing with the grey.
|
|%-David
|
|in an a-b-c system of multiple hosts, does the security tally from a
|carry on to |B? I think not.
| Ferri | |

%The security tally carries from RTG to LTG to PLTG, why
%not from PLTG to PLTG? Especially when they're within the
%same system. The only instance I know of where you can
%get rid of your security tally is when switching from RTG
%to RTG. 'Course, I'm only about 1/3 of the way through
%VR2.0.
%Which rule are you talking about?

%-David

In one of the adv. s in the election time [Dukelzahn's little test] the effects
of security tally were stated such:
host a: sec tally 5 warning from ucas govt, 8 tracer IC host b: [a red 11
host! marked with a "deadly force authorised"icon [cool icon , you should have
seen the face of the decker :) ] there was a separate tally starting from 1
again and in host 3 the tally started again, with a probe11-tracer8 starting at
sec. tally 5

then again, i'm 2/3ds of vr2.0

Ferri