Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Self-Upgrading Fake IDs
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 12:28:16 +0200
>How about something like a threshold for the number of tests to complete?
>You start out with a level three progressive. To make it to level 4, the
>ID must be taken as genuine (i.e. passed the opposed tests it makes) 4
>times. To go from 4 to 5 takes 5 succesful checks, etc.

Sounds good.

>To make it a
>little more difficult, there also must be a minimum difficulty to the
>check, no more than say a 2 level difference. That means that if you want
>to raise a level 5 to a level 6 you have to beat 6 level 4 or greater ID
>checkers (no going to local Stuffer Shack to build an easy ID:).

What you mean is that you have to beat a scanner of a maximum of 2 points
less than the new rating of your ID for it to count?
Maybe the following also works: defeat a ratings total of the square of the
new level of your ID for it to go up by 1. So to go from 3 to 4 requires you
to pass a total of 16 rating points worth of scanners. And whether you get
through 4 rating 4 scanners or through 16 rating 1 models doesn't matter...

>doing most of this off of the top of my head, but it is coming out
>sounding fairly reasonable.

It works for me :)


Gurth@******.nl - Gurth@***.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
WANNEER HOUDT DIE KLOTE HITTE NOU EENS OP?!?!
Geek Code v2.1: GS/AT/! -d+ H s:- !g p?(3) !au a>? w+(+++) v*(---) C+(++) U
P? !L !3 E? N++ K- W+ -po+(po) Y+ t(+) 5 !j R+(++)>+++$ tv+(++) b+@ D+(++)
B? e+ u+@ h! f--(?) !r(--)(*) n---->!n y? Unofficial Shadowrun Guru :)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Self-Upgrading Fake IDs, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.