Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: robertennew@*****.com.au (Robert Ennew)
Subject: (semi OT)Re: Vehicle armour
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:49:16 +1100 (EST)
--- Rand Ratinac <docwagon101@*****.com> wrote: >
<snip>
> what if underneath that standard armour you install
> a
> few points of concealed armour? Gangers open up on
> you
> with heavy pistols or what-have-you expecting to put
> a
> few dings in your ride - and aren't they surprised
> when the bullets just bounce off? Same thing goes

Isn't It a concern of people that In the case above
that Bullets just don't bounce off armour In general.
If anything the armour may absorb or stop penetration,
but the puncture mark or even the round is still
imbedded In the armour. In the case above, If a round
is solid enough to puncture the top obvious layer of
armour but not the concealed layer, It's still gonna
stop the frame from being punctured but It's still
gonna puncture the top layer of armour with the
slug(s).
Shouldn't there be some sort of barrier rating that
goes along with armour, so the GM can figure out
whether your driving around In a ride that looks like
It's just driven through a Beruit rush hour, or a car
In a scrap In the barrens looks like It's had a detail
& wax job, not a scratch on It.

GZ

http://greetings.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Greetings
Send your love online with Yahoo! Greetings - FREE!

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about (semi OT)Re: Vehicle armour, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.