Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Tim Cooper <z-i-m@****.COM>
Subject: Re: SHADOWLAND IS GO!!!! [OT]
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 23:00:31 EST
On Sun, 2 Nov 1997 02:33:14 +0000 Avenger writes:
>Well, Shadowland Five, frontpage, took around 1 minute 13 seconds to
>come down on 55.6, the front end has changed from what I remember,
>though I'm not too impressed with the front page graphic.

Last time I stopped by, SL 4 just came up and I tried accessing it with
Netscape 3 from my univ. SPARC lab (I'm pretty sure we had at least a T1)
and I ended up having to kill it before I even got anywhere cause I ran
out of lunch break.

>Somebody needs to review their colour scheme as well. The disclaimer is
>so small it's virtually unreadable, and is contained in a poorly
>formatted table, the black on dark blue section of the entry form is
>unreadable, but once past that, everything is pretty much OK.

<gripe>
You know, sometimes I wonder if people who design casual webpages even
LOOK at what they've written before putting it up... No matter how much
you might like them, certain colo(u)rs do not make good fore/back-ground
combos. ('course I just recently spent 2 hours agonizing over the 3
color scheme for a VB prog..so..) ... and then there's the people that
think a really complex, high contrast graphic is the perfect thing to
tile behind real small, text that just so happens to be a tint or shade
of colors used in the graphic.... Ever wonder if programers should be
required to take an art class before being allowed to design something
that other people will have to look at?
</gripe>

>Various screens open in seperate windows - consider using something like
>MSIE 4.0 (though I wouldn't advise it) or (better for this) Netscape...

And a big monitor too.. right?

~Tim (oops... this is completely OT.. sorry)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about SHADOWLAND IS GO!!!! [OT], you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.