Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Scott Spencer <java@**********.COM>
Subject: Shadowland [semi-OT]
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 15:22:49 PST
Has anyone gotten or seen the Oct. Shadowland fanzine?

"And into the heart of the Storm, with a cry that pierced all other sounds,
tearing clouds asunder, the Nazgul came...And all were branded with the
foul token of the Lidless Eye"

java@**********.com
Message no. 2
From: lucifer <lucifer@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Shadowland [semi-OT]
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 00:04:01 -0600
Scott Spencer wrote:

> Has anyone gotten or seen the Oct. Shadowland fanzine?

I've been in contact with SOK and all they tell me is that the editor
is still working on issue #7. *grin* I'm as anxious as you are for it. =


Lucifer
Prince of Darkness, Eater of Souls

"One owes respect to the living. To the Dead one owes
only Truth."--Voltaire

"When devils will the blackest sins put on, they
do suggest at first with heavenly shows."--Shakespeare,
from 'Othello'
Message no. 3
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Shadowland [semi-OT]
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 11:46:14 +0100
Scott Spencer said on 15:22/16 Nov 97...

> Has anyone gotten or seen the Oct. Shadowland fanzine?

Not me. Issue 6 is from about half a year ago, so there have been two
more issues by now, but I haven't seen any #7 or #8...

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
The future. Available tomorrow.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Shadowland [semi-OT], you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.