Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: James Ojaste <jojaste@*****.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Subject: Re: Shadowmaniacs
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 10:38:05 -0400 (EDT)
>
> > >Caric wrote:
> > >Agreed. Stop now, before we end up with an Animaniacs Shaman.
>
> You ain't seen nothing yet...
>
> "Ok, guys! All together now!"
>
> "ShadowManiacs," the official ShadowRN mailing list theme song

ROTFL!

James-the-everybody-else-is-doing-it-guy
Message no. 2
From: The Jestyr <s421539@*******.gu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Shadowmaniacs!
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 07:53:49 +1000 (EST)
> Would you please trim posts!

*raising hand* I second that.

> And some folks need to read the FAQ :), several recent first posts
> seemed to demonstrate lack of reading, i know some of its boring but
> there is actually useful information in there.

Boring? *gasp* How can the FAQ be BORING??? :) Anyway, serious point: I
haven't seen a copy of the FAQ for ages... now, I know I shouldn't do
this, but I"ll offer: if Fro wishes to delegate the position of FAQ
maintainer (or assistant FAQ maintainer) to moi, I'm happy to do it... if
only to see a copy of the FAQ again! :)

Lady Jestyr

------------------------------------------------------
A titanic intellect... in a world full of icebergs
------------------------------------------------------
Elle Holmes s421539@*****.student.gu.edu.au
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1503
------------------------------------------------------
Message no. 3
From: NightLife <habenir@******.san.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: Shadowmaniacs!
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 1996 18:49:14 -0700
At 07:53 AM 10/8/96 +1000, The Jestyr wrote:
>
>> Would you please trim posts!
>
>*raising hand* I second that.

Make that three.
>
>> And some folks need to read the FAQ :), several recent first posts
>> seemed to demonstrate lack of reading, i know some of its boring but
>> there is actually useful information in there.
>
>Boring? *gasp* How can the FAQ be BORING??? :) Anyway, serious point: I
>haven't seen a copy of the FAQ for ages... now, I know I shouldn't do
>this, but I"ll offer: if Fro wishes to delegate the position of FAQ
>maintainer (or assistant FAQ maintainer) to moi, I'm happy to do it... if
>only to see a copy of the FAQ again! :)
>
>Lady Jestyr
>
>------------------------------------------------------
>A titanic intellect... in a world full of icebergs
>------------------------------------------------------
>Elle Holmes s421539@*****.student.gu.edu.au
>http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1503
>------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nightlife Inc.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you have to ask then it's probably classified.
Which means that I have to follow protocol.
But if you ask nicley I might forget that you asked.
Then again maybe not.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Document Classified
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Message no. 4
From: Pete Sims <petesims@********.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Shadowmaniacs!
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 02:20:47 +0100
In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.961008075105.21677A-100000@*****.student.gu.ed
u.au>, The Jestyr <s421539@*******.gu.edu.au> writes
>
>> Would you please trim posts!
>
>*raising hand* I second that.
>
>> And some folks need to read the FAQ :), several recent first posts
>> seemed to demonstrate lack of reading, i know some of its boring but
>> there is actually useful information in there.
>
>Boring? *gasp* How can the FAQ be BORING??? :) Anyway, serious point: I
>haven't seen a copy of the FAQ for ages... now, I know I shouldn't do
>this, but I"ll offer: if Fro wishes to delegate the position of FAQ
>maintainer (or assistant FAQ maintainer) to moi, I'm happy to do it... if
>only to see a copy of the FAQ again! :)

Could I just take this moment to point out that the FAQ is in desperate
need of updating, it contains a couple of references that are painfully
innacurate, and also refers to Hearn as the list serve, where the list
has actually moved to itribe and has been here for a little while now.

I don't know who's responsible for the FAQ, but could we give them a
gentle kick in the shin please, and maybe post it to the list on a
monthly or bi-monthly basis, for those who can't find it. :)

Just my thoughts.

Pete
--
Pete Sims
Heroes or Fools? That's a determination others will make in hindsight. But by
being here now, we make that determination for ourselves, and it's neither.
Lt.Col.T.C.McQueen
Message no. 5
From: Jamie Houston <s430472@*******.gu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Shadowmaniacs!
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 16:43:23 +1000 (EST)
On Sun, 6 Oct 1996, NightLife wrote:

> At 07:53 AM 10/8/96 +1000, The Jestyr wrote:
> >
> >> Would you please trim posts!
> >
> >*raising hand* I second that.
>
> Make that three.
> >
Yeah! I agree....hang on...I was the rotten sod who did it in the first
place and started all this :)
Sorry...I take that back and abstain from voting *guilty grin*

Hamish the 2 centimetre tall Scot

______________________________________________________________________
Jamie Houston * "If a kid asks why it's raining,
aka Bollox, Hamish,(and * a cute thing to tell him is "God is
lots of other unmentionable * crying"...And if he asks why God is
pseudonyms) * crying, another cute thing to tell
s430472@*****.student.gu.edu.au * him is "It's probably something
Griffith Uni * you did!"
______________________________________________________________________
Message no. 6
From: The Jestyr <s421539@*******.gu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Shadowmaniacs!
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 18:21:11 +1000 (EST)
> Could I just take this moment to point out that the FAQ is in desperate
> need of updating, it contains a couple of references that are painfully
> innacurate, and also refers to Hearn as the list serve, where the list
> has actually moved to itribe and has been here for a little while now.
>
> I don't know who's responsible for the FAQ, but could we give them a
> gentle kick in the shin please, and maybe post it to the list on a
> monthly or bi-monthly basis, for those who can't find it. :)

I have already offered to update and be responsible for the FAQ, but
haven't received any response.

Lady Jestyr

------------------------------------------------------
A titanic intellect... in a world full of icebergs
------------------------------------------------------
Elle Holmes s421539@*****.student.gu.edu.au
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1503
------------------------------------------------------
Message no. 7
From: Pete Sims <petesims@********.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Shadowmaniacs!
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 01:54:33 +0100
In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.961008182029.22535E-100000@*****.student.gu.ed
u.au>, The Jestyr <s421539@*******.gu.edu.au> writes

[snip FAQ update and shin kicking]
>I have already offered to update and be responsible for the FAQ, but
>haven't received any response.
>
I noticed your post asking about it, don't worry Jestyr, you'll get a
reply, it just won't have any relevance to the question :)

Pete
--
Pete Sims
Heroes or Fools? That's a determination others will make in hindsight. But by
being here now, we make that determination for ourselves, and it's neither.
Lt.Col.T.C.McQueen

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Shadowmaniacs!, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.