Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Bryan D. Jones" <bdj@****.UARK.EDU>
Subject: ShadowRN WWW server
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 1994 20:11:46 -0600
Can someone throw the address at me again? I just deleted it by accident.
I know life's hard ain't it?

Quarm

--
Bryan D. Jones Computing Services
Internet: bdj@****.uark.edu University of Arkansas
Internet: bdj@****.uark.edu Bitnet bdj@*******
GAT d--(?) -p+ c++(++++) l+(-) u++ e*/+ m---(*) s/- n---(+) h* f+
g- w++ t++ r++ y+
Message no. 2
From: Mark Imbriaco <mark@**.ODU.EDU>
Subject: Re: ShadowRN WWW server
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 1994 21:31:38 -0500
On Mon, 21 Feb 1994, Bryan D. Jones wrote:

> Can someone throw the address at me again? I just deleted it by accident.
> I know life's hard ain't it?
>
> Quarm
>

http://www.cs.odu.edu/~mark/

Let me know if you like it. :-)

Mark Imbriaco
mark@**.odu.edu
Message no. 3
From: James David Bathurst <BATHURSJ@*****.BITNET>
Subject: Re: ShadowRN WWW server
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 1994 23:17:35 -0500
I'd like to get a hold of that address, too, if it isn't too much
trouble for the parties involved...
Message no. 4
From: johnson1 <johnson1@**.UWP.EDU>
Subject: Re: ShadowRN WWW server
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 1994 23:40:22 -0600
On Mon, 21 Feb 1994, Mark Imbriaco wrote:

>
> http://www.cs.odu.edu/~mark/
>
> Let me know if you like it. :-)
>
> Mark Imbriaco
> mark@**.odu.edu

I like it. Very sexxy.

(hi guys.)

Christina M. Johnson johnson1@**.uwp.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have found some kind of temporary sanity in this.
-Tool

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about ShadowRN WWW server, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.