Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Shawn Baumgartner <Breakdown@*****.NET>
Subject: Shadowrun guru
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 05:55:11 -0500
Sorry, Gurth, I'm afraid I can't nominate you as the "Official Shadowrn
Guru." <grin> You'll just have to settle for "NERPS Project Leader"
:)

Shawn
Just read the NERPS FAQ.

*******************************************
Out of the gutter and into your mailer!
Message no. 2
From: Phil Smith phil_urbanhell@*******.com
Subject: Shadowrun Guru
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 20:48:15 GMT
Hey Gurth: do you have to run for Unofficial Shadowrun Guru every year or is
it a title that lasts for life? :)

Phil
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 3
From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Shadowrun Guru
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 10:57:15 +0200
According to Phil Smith, at 20:48 on 2 May 00, the word on the street
was...

> Hey Gurth: do you have to run for Unofficial Shadowrun Guru every year or is
> it a title that lasts for life? :)

Actually, I never "ran for it" at all, it more or less just got awarded,
back in '95. To be more precise, I and someone else only got nominated for
it, but we decided to leave the "nominated for" bit off after a while.

Here's the post that started it:

-----

Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1995 07:06:05 -0600
Reply-To: Discussion of the Fantasy game ShadowRun
<SHADOWRN@***.surfnet.nl>
Sender: Discussion of the Fantasy game ShadowRun <SHADOWRN@***.surfnet.nl>
From: Keith Johnson <jrsnyder@********.WISC.EDU>
Subject: All Praises
To: Multiple recipients of list SHADOWRN <SHADOWRN@***.surfnet.nl>
X-UIDL: 796036022.033

All praises to Damion and Gurth!!!

They have excellent knowledge and perspective!!!

They understand questions, and give interesting advice!!!

I hereby nominate both these people for the title

of Shadowrun Guru...

Keith

who hopes to be a guru too someday
Message no. 4
From: Phil Smith phil_urbanhell@*******.com
Subject: Shadowrun Guru
Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 19:56:30 GMT
Cool. I was just thinking, if it was yearly you would probably have my vote
but if Doc ran (following that ally spirt-preservative comment) I could be
swayed:)

Phil
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 5
From: Rand Ratinac docwagon101@*****.com
Subject: Shadowrun Guru
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 20:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
> Cool. I was just thinking, if it was yearly you
would probably have my vote but if Doc ran (following
that ally spirt-preservative comment) I could be
swayed:)
> Phil

*lol*

I'm flattered, Phil, but you'd probably have to come
up with some special category for me. I don't know
that "Guru" is the appropriate term. :)

Hey, what was the leader of that "Orange People" cult called?

====Doc'
(aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow, aka Doc'-booner)

S.S. f. P.S.C. & D.J.

.sig Sauer

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
Message no. 6
From: Mik hangfire@*********.net.au
Subject: Shadowrun Guru
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 14:02:36 +1000
psychotic?

<grin>

Mik


----- Original Message -----
From: Rand Ratinac <docwagon101@*****.com>

>
> I'm flattered, Phil, but you'd probably have to come
> up with some special category for me. I don't know
> that "Guru" is the appropriate term. :)
>
> Hey, what was the leader of that "Orange People" cult called?
>
> ====> Doc'
> (aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow, aka Doc'-booner)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Shadowrun Guru, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!