Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Shadowrun (no, not ShadowRN) FAQ
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 18:00:40 +0100
>NO YOU CAN'T!! - NO INITIATIVE INCREASES ARE CUMULATIVE
> We have to remind people on this every so often.

Put it in the FAQ! :) (Oh no, not that thread AGAIN! :)

BTW, is there a FAQ for the Shadowrun _game_ itself? Something that answers
the questions that gets asked, say, at least twice a month on this list?
(that would be a huge file! :)


Gurth@******.nl - Gurth@***.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Every time you shake someone's hand It determines where you stand
Geek Code v2.1: GS/AT/! -d+ H s:- !g p?(3) !au a>? w+(+++) v*(---) C+(++) U
P? !L !3 E? N++ K- W+ -po+(po) Y+ t(+) 5 !j R+(++)>+++$ tv+(++) b+@ D+(++)
B? e+ u+@ h! f--(?) !r(--)(*) n---->!n y?
Message no. 2
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@****.CAIS.COM>
Subject: Re: Shadowrun (no, not ShadowRN) FAQ
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 17:28:51 -0500
On Thu, 16 Feb 1995, Gurth wrote:

> BTW, is there a FAQ for the Shadowrun _game_ itself? Something that answers
> the questions that gets asked, say, at least twice a month on this list?
> (that would be a huge file! :)

Yup...it's sometimes posted to rec.games.frp.cyber; monthly, I
think. Twice, now, I've sent EMail to the guy who maintains it,
suggesting that since we run related FAQs we should at the /very/ least
mention each others' FAQ's existance in our own respective documents, but
he has never replied.

-------------========== J.D. Falk <jdfalk@****.com> =========-------------
| "The problem was that there was a Stonehenge monument on the stage |
| that was in danger of being crushed by a dwarf. That tends to |
| understate the hugeness of the object." --This Is Spinal Tap |
--------========== http://www.cais.com/jdfalk/home.html ==========--------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Shadowrun (no, not ShadowRN) FAQ, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.