Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: justin@***********.net (Justin Bell)
Subject: [shadowrun] RE: Shadowrun 4?
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:46:11 -0500
On 3/15/2005 9:27 PM, Zebulin wrote:
>
>
> Would it be possible to have more than 1000 hard copies even produced? The
> binding for SR3 books is atrocious, and I'd love to actually have the main
> book in hard cover without having to be a lucky 1 in a thousand like last
> time.

This hardcover rulebook contains all the rules gamemasters and players
need to create characters and ongoing adventures set in the popular
Shadowrun universe. Note that the Shadowrun, Fourth Edition will replace
the Shadowrun, Third Edition rules set. Source material from previous
editions will still be compatible.

Note the word hardcover?
Message no. 2
From: zebulingod@*******.net (Zebulin)
Subject: [shadowrun] RE: Shadowrun 4?
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:43:43 -0800
Justin Bell wrote:
>
> This hardcover rulebook contains all the rules gamemasters
> and players need to create characters and ongoing adventures
> set in the popular Shadowrun universe. Note that the
> Shadowrun, Fourth Edition will replace the Shadowrun, Third
> Edition rules set. Source material from previous editions
> will still be compatible.
>
> Note the word hardcover?
>

Sweet. And I was just sayin', you know?

Zebulin

>From The Top 100 Things I'd Do
If I Ever Became An Evil Overlord

15. I will never employ any device with a digital countdown. If I find that
such a device is absolutely unavoidable, I will set it to activate when the
counter reaches 117 and the hero is just putting his plan into operation.
Message no. 3
From: justin@***********.net (Justin Bell)
Subject: [shadowrun] RE: Shadowrun 4?
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:26:41 -0500
Zebulin wrote:
> Justin Bell wrote:
>
>>This hardcover rulebook contains all the rules gamemasters
>>and players need to create characters and ongoing adventures
>>set in the popular Shadowrun universe. Note that the
>>Shadowrun, Fourth Edition will replace the Shadowrun, Third
>>Edition rules set. Source material from previous editions
>>will still be compatible.
>>
>>Note the word hardcover?
>>
>
>
> Sweet. And I was just sayin', you know?

Yep. If I came across as snippy or short, just wanted to point out a
piece of information I read in one of the short blurbs that others may
have missed.
Message no. 4
From: loneeagle@********.co.uk (Lone Eagle)
Subject: [shadowrun] RE: Shadowrun 4?
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:21:17 +0000
At 02:46 AM 3/16/2005, Justin Bell wrote:
>This hardcover rulebook contains all the rules gamemasters and players
>need to create characters and ongoing adventures set in the popular
>Shadowrun universe. Note that the Shadowrun, Fourth Edition will replace
>the Shadowrun, Third Edition rules set. Source material from previous
>editions will still be compatible.
>
>Note the word hardcover?

Oh yes...

I'd still like to see BABYs - perhaps one reserved for everyone on this
list? :-)


--
Lone Eagle
"Hold up lads, I got an idea."

www.wyrmtalk.co.uk - Please be patient, this site is under construction

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GE d++(---) s++: a->? C++(+) US++ P! L E? W++ N o? K? w+ O! M- V? PS+ PE-()
Y PGP? t+@ 5++ X- R+>+++$>* tv b+++ DI++++ D+ G++ e+ h r* y+>+++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----

GCC0.2: y75>?.uk[NN] G87 S@:@@[SR] B+++ f+ RM(RR) rm++ rr++ l++(--) m- w
s+(+++) GM+++(-) A GS+(-) h++ LA+++ CG--- F c+
Message no. 5
From: justin@***********.net (Justin Bell)
Subject: [shadowrun] Re: Shadowrun 4?
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:42:11 -0500
On 3/20/2005 12:39 PM, Failhelm wrote:
> Several others, although D&D took the longest per edition, approx 1
> decade (sometimes longer per edition change).

Ignoring the frustrating 3-3.5 edition crap?
Message no. 6
From: failhelm@*****.com (Failhelm)
Subject: [shadowrun] Re: Shadowrun 4?
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:34:18 -0800
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:42:11 -0500, Justin Bell <justin@***********.net> wrote:
> On 3/20/2005 12:39 PM, Failhelm wrote:
> > Several others, although D&D took the longest per edition, approx 1
> > decade (sometimes longer per edition change).
>
> Ignoring the frustrating 3-3.5 edition crap?

Doesn't everybody :)
Message no. 7
From: Paul.Grosse@***********.com (Paul Grosse)
Subject: [shadowrun] Re: Shadowrun 4?
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:32:00 -0500
>
> On 3/20/2005 12:39 PM, Failhelm wrote:
> > Several others, although D&D took the longest per edition, approx 1
> > decade (sometimes longer per edition change).
>
> Ignoring the frustrating 3-3.5 edition crap?
>
>

Well I have to say that on the whole MOST of the changes were better, or
at least less murky :) But on to other ShadowRun discussions

Paul G.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [shadowrun] RE: Shadowrun 4?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.