Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: rencheple@*******.net (Tim Martin)
Subject: ShadowrunRPG.com RSS2 Feed
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:36:39 -0400
It appears to me that the RSS2 feed link on the ShadowrunRPG.com page is
not actually a like to a RSS2 feed, but rather just a like back to the
source page. Am I missing something?

Thanks

Tim
Message no. 2
From: adam_carter@******.net (Adam Carter)
Subject: ShadowrunRPG.com RSS2 Feed
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 07:06:31 -0700
<<
It appears to me that the RSS2 feed link on the ShadowrunRPG.com page is
not actually a like to a RSS2 feed, but rather just a like back to the
source page. Am I missing something?
>>
The feed I am using is http://www.shadowrunrpg.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2
Message no. 3
From: rencheple@*******.net (Tim Martin)
Subject: ShadowrunRPG.com RSS2 Feed
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:07:28 -0400
Adam Carter wrote:
> <<
> It appears to me that the RSS2 feed link on the ShadowrunRPG.com page is
> not actually a like to a RSS2 feed, but rather just a like back to the
> source page. Am I missing something?
>
> The feed I am using is http://www.shadowrunrpg.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2
>
>
>
>
>
Machos Gracias! Hopefully, Fanpro can fix the link as well.

Tim
Message no. 4
From: justin@***********.net (Justin Bell)
Subject: ShadowrunRPG.com RSS2 Feed
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:30:05 -0500
On 10/26/2005 9:06 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
> <<
> It appears to me that the RSS2 feed link on the ShadowrunRPG.com page is
> not actually a like to a RSS2 feed, but rather just a like back to the
> source page. Am I missing something?
> The feed I am using is http://www.shadowrunrpg.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2

Looks like a valid rss feed to me.
Message no. 5
From: tommy.lindner@******.de (Tommy Lindner)
Subject: ShadowrunRPG.com RSS2 Feed
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:12:03 +0200
Justin Bell schrieb:

> Looks like a valid rss feed to me.
>
>
My Firefox browser isn't able to find the style information.

Tommy
Message no. 6
From: raymacey@*****.com (Ray Macey)
Subject: ShadowrunRPG.com RSS2 Feed
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 02:41:13 +1000
On 10/27/05, Tommy Lindner <tommy.lindner@******.de> wrote:
> My Firefox browser isn't able to find the style information.
>
> Tommy

RSS feeds don't need style information. They're not designed to be
displayed in browsers :)

--
http://cyron.id.au
Message no. 7
From: justin@***********.net (Justin Bell)
Subject: ShadowrunRPG.com RSS2 Feed
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:47:58 -0500
On 10/26/2005 11:12 AM, Tommy Lindner wrote:
> Justin Bell schrieb:
>
>> Looks like a valid rss feed to me.
>>
>>
> My Firefox browser isn't able to find the style information.

That would be a problem if it was supposed to be viewed with a web
browser, it's an RSS feed that requires an RSS reader to read it.
Message no. 8
From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: ShadowrunRPG.com RSS2 Feed
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:05:16 +0200
According to Tim Martin, on 26-10-05 15:36 the word on the street was...

> It appears to me that the RSS2 feed link on the ShadowrunRPG.com page is
> not actually a like to a RSS2 feed, but rather just a like back to the
> source page. Am I missing something?

It seems to work properly in Safari -- if I click the "RSS" icon in the
address bar the page switches to the URL that Adam Carter also posted.

--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
I'll let you be in my dream if I can be in yours
-> Possibly NAGEE Editor & ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Site: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UB+ P(+) L++ E W++(--) N o? K w-- O
M+ PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about ShadowrunRPG.com RSS2 Feed, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!