Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: ArkAngel <DUNN@******.BITNET>
Subject: Shadowtalk list NOT
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 92 16:36:00 EST
Hoi chumlich, I hate ta break it ta ya, but I gotta agree with Dave
here... Ya see, it seems to me very unnecessary to set up another mailing list
here. The ShadowTalk expands on the SR game just as much as alla the rules
crap we discuss here. (Actually in my opinion it expands a helluva lot more)
And while it might make sense to subscribe to a second list, I really don't see
the necessity once more. It's not like either A) A GM could prevent his
players from being on both lists, or for that matter B) There's actually stuff
here players shouldn't/can't see...
Let's face it... if the ShadowTalk aspect of the Shadowrn list is what
makes the rules applicable... deletion of one or the other would be ultimately
senseless... but to the point of this post,

>>>>>I hear a rumor that there's a new UB branch setting up physically
inside of the Renraku Archology. Anybody wanna vouch for or against this one?
I mean, the whole idea of 'raku actively supporting UB gives me the shivers...

"Watch your Back. Shoot Straight. Conserve Ammo.
And Never, Ever cut a deal with a Dragon."
dunn@******.jcu.edu

>>>>>[ArkAngel.Logout]>>>>>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Shadowtalk list NOT, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.