Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Jeff Riordan <corwin6@***.NET>
Subject: Shape Change Limitation
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 22:18:43 -0400
For those GMs who are wondering how to limit the overuse of a spell
like this without saying "NO" just remind the player how long it took
them to learn to Walk. Hmmm... I think babies are walking by age 1
or 2. Let's give the player the benefit of the doubt and say they are
smarter then a baby :) . So Mr. Mage can shape his body into any form
he wants. When was the last time he ran on all four? Let alone try to
pump his wings hard enough to fly? While the spell gives you the form
you're mental attrabutes are still yours. How many mages have actually
been a tiger? I would say while you can stand there and swipe at someone
with your paws (tiger form) actually running someone down is another thing.
As for the Fly flying in the mouth I would love to know how the runner
deals with a kalidescope type input derived from what is normally
stereoscopic Eyesight. (Similar to trying to interpret a themal image
for the first time in real life.)

Just because you can theoretically turn into a Blue Whale doesn't mean
it doesn't have it's draw back.
The only exception I would have to the above is when Shaman turn into
their Totem. That is the only example where the runner would know what
to do with the muscles and bone structure he has.

Just my two cents.... :_)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Never trust a relative. It is far worse than trusting strangers. With
strangers there is a possibility that you might be safe. Of course it
does not apply to me. I am the soul of honor, kindness, mercy and
goodness. Trust me in all things." Prince Corwin "The Guns of Avalon"

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Shape Change Limitation, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.