Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Aristotle antithesis@**********.com
Subject: Shapeshifters and birthdays.
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 23:02:57 -0400
Greetings -n- Salutations,


I posed a question on Undernet #Shadowrun and got some good feedback, but
I thought I would bring the question here as well to try and get some
other points of view.

Shapeshifters are animals that can take on (meta)human form. So do they
age as a (meta)human or do they age as animals? Or.. do they have their
own lifespans completely separate from both the animal they resemble and
the (meta)humans they can appear as?


Gotta theory?
--Travis "Aristotle" Heldibridle
Message no. 2
From: Simon and Fiona sfuller@******.com.au
Subject: Shapeshifters and birthdays.
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:14:06 +1000
-----Original Message-----
From: Aristotle <antithesis@**********.com>
To: ShadowRN (E-mail) <shadowrn@*********.com>
Date: Saturday, July 29, 2000 1:05 PM
Subject: Shapeshifters and birthdays.


>Greetings -n- Salutations,
>
>
>I posed a question on Undernet #Shadowrun and got some good feedback, but
>I thought I would bring the question here as well to try and get some
>other points of view.
>
>Shapeshifters are animals that can take on (meta)human form. So do they
>age as a (meta)human or do they age as animals? Or.. do they have their
>own lifespans completely separate from both the animal they resemble and
>the (meta)humans they can appear as?
>
>
>Gotta theory?


Good question. The regeneration could counteract aging indefinitely, but
then they'd have the Immunity to Aging power. I'd say they should age just
like whatever animal they awakened from. Of course, animals don't feel their
age like humans do, barring arthritis or other medical conditions (that a
regenerating creature may or may not suffer from), animals barely slow down
until they stop entirely.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Shapeshifters and birthdays., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.