From: | Doctor Doom <JCH8169@*****.TAMU.EDU> |
---|---|
Subject: | Sidestepping the Gun Anchor argument... |
Date: | Sat, 2 Oct 1993 03:43:40 -0500 |
>So, a question. Can I Anchor a spell to a gun? The idea is to anchor a
>'detect enemies' to the gun, with the qualifier being that the spell only
>works in the arc of fire. Then the 'detect' spell would fire (pardon the
>pun) either a 'ram' spell or 'magic fingers' spell (or other manipulation
>spell) to fire the gun, as long as the 'enemy' is in the arc of fire.
Refraining from commenting upon the above idea of questionable merit...[Detect
Enemies is not quite so specific a spell as one would like...essentially, it
determine other individual's (even remotely) hostile thoughts...not necessarily
ones that would lead them to attack one...(talk about going off half-cocked)]
Another question springs to mind:
In a group of a bygone era, the Rigger and myself (I was playing a technomancer
at the time) theorized and pontificated upon the possibility of joinly
developing and (myself) programming a fire control program for use in
integration with the Rigger's vehicle, which would permit him a great deal more
flexibility in combat.
The Game Magestrix rejected the idea, stating that neither I nor he possess the
requisite skill level. My personal opinion is that she was not inclined to
"deal with it" (to use the colloqual expression).
Any thoughts/observations/questions?
Colonel Count von Hohenzollern und von Doom, DMSc, DSc, PhD.
Doom Technologies & Weapon Systems -- Dark Thought Publications
>>> Working on solutions best left in the dark.
<<<
[ Doctor Doom : jch8169@********.tamu.edu ]
^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^
"A prince should therefore have no other aim or thought, not take up any other
thing for his study, but war and its organization and discipline, for that is
the only art that is necessary to one who commands."
-- Niccolo Machiavelli