Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: rencheple@*******.net (Tim Martin)
Subject: SINners and SINlessness
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:07:34 -0500
I'm still a little shaky on the demonstrable effects of being a SINner
and/or testing a fake SIN.

What is the real down side to being a SINner? If you constantly use fake
SINs on runs, then your but should be covered, right?

How is a fake SIN tested? Obviously, it's an opposed test, but what
resources would Saeder-Krupp or Lone Star be able to bring to bear on
testing a SIN?

What would the consequences be if it is broken? Just a criminal SIN?
Big deal - you go out and buy a new (fake) SIN, right?

Tim
Message no. 2
From: raymacey@*****.com (Ray Macey)
Subject: SINners and SINlessness
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:37:57 +1000
On 12/15/05, Tim Martin <rencheple@*******.net> wrote:
> I'm still a little shaky on the demonstrable effects of being a SINner
> and/or testing a fake SIN.
>
> What is the real down side to being a SINner? If you constantly use fake
> SINs on runs, then your but should be covered, right?

Your real details are linked to your biometric information. Leave
behind a fingerprint/bloodsample etc, or get your face caught on
camera, and it will be possible to find the /real/ you. Even if they
can't locate you, they still know it's you, and you will have a nice
list of felonies waiting for you should they ever manage to catch you.

Then of course, if you've got family and friends from before you
started running the shadows, they're at risk if the people that find
you are less than law abiding

All in all, it's not a terribly large flaw, but it does have its annoyances

--
http://cyron.id.au

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about SINners and SINlessness, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.