From: | rencheple@*******.net (Tim Martin) |
---|---|
Subject: | SINners and SINlessness |
Date: | Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:07:34 -0500 |
and/or testing a fake SIN.
What is the real down side to being a SINner? If you constantly use fake
SINs on runs, then your but should be covered, right?
How is a fake SIN tested? Obviously, it's an opposed test, but what
resources would Saeder-Krupp or Lone Star be able to bring to bear on
testing a SIN?
What would the consequences be if it is broken? Just a criminal SIN?
Big deal - you go out and buy a new (fake) SIN, right?
Tim