Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: KiltedJamesman@***.com (KiltedJamesman@***.com)
Subject: Slightly OT Re: Anti-roleplaying sentiments
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:16:31 EDT
In a message dated 10/14/2002 4:03:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GuayII@***.com writes:

> The only anti-RPG sentiment that I can think of off hand is that some
> experts have claimed that the Washington DC area sniper is "probably a
loner
> who plays D&D." (read that after the news about the tarot card was
released...
> Ugh.)

Funny thing that. I'd been thinking it might've been somebody who'd played
Silent Scope too much and snapped. Before this starts a flame war, let me be
the first to say I have no illusions that games, movies, or any other
entertainment media create psychotic behaviour. They only inspire them. These
same people would still snap...they'd just do it in a different but no less
lethal way in my opinion.
Message no. 2
From: GuayII@***.com (GuayII@***.com)
Subject: Slightly OT Re: Anti-roleplaying sentiments
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 23:28:55 -0400
In a message dated 10/14/2002 9:16:31 PM Eastern Standard Time, KiltedJamesman@***.com
writes:

>Funny thing that. I'd been thinking it might've been somebody who'd played
>Silent Scope too much and snapped. Before this starts a flame war, let me be
>the first to say I have no illusions that games, movies, or any other
>entertainment media create psychotic behaviour. They only inspire them. These
>same people would still snap...they'd just do it in a different but no less
>lethal way in my opinion.

*nods* If RPG's are taken away, then the behavior will be blamed on something else. If
that something else is taken away, then it will be blamed on something *else.*

Cash
Message no. 3
From: Gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Slightly OT Re: Anti-roleplaying sentiments
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:43:17 +0200
According to GuayII@***.com, on Tue, 15 Oct 2002 the word on the street was...

> *nods* If RPG's are taken away, then the behavior will be blamed on
> something else. If that something else is taken away, then it will be
> blamed on something *else.*

Unfortunately, it's not going to be all that easy convincing some people of that...

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
I know all this and more
-> Probably NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 4
From: GuayII@***.com (GuayII@***.com)
Subject: Slightly OT Re: Anti-roleplaying sentiments
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:29:24 -0400
In a message dated Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:43:17 +0200, Gurth <Gurth@******.nl> writes:

>According to GuayII@***.com, on Tue, 15 Oct 2002 the word on the street was...
>
>> *nods* If RPG's are taken away, then the behavior will be blamed on
>> something else. If that something else is taken away, then it will be
>> blamed on something *else.*
>
>Unfortunately, it's not going to be all that easy convincing some people of that...

I took part in a survey today (was interviewed by a psychologist about my internet/DSL
usage). One of the questions was "What do you dislike?" My response was stupid
people.

I should have used this as an example of what I meant. :)

Cash
Message no. 5
From: snake.eyes@***.net (Snake Eyes)
Subject: Slightly OT Re: Anti-roleplaying sentiments
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 04:39:53 -0700
At 11:28 PM 10/14/2002 -0400, Cash wrote:

>*nods* If RPG's are taken away, then the behavior will be blamed on
>something else. If that something else is taken away, then it will be
>blamed on something *else.*

Given that approach, I say we keep taking stuff away until everyone
realizes it's all caused by a combination of shitty parenting and
glamorization of evil by the American news media. That'll shut them up. ;)

~ Snake Eyes

----------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC0.2:
y71.us[SFO] G82 SMO/PA:Hf/j[T2K] B+ f-(--) RM rm++ rr++ l-(+) m-(+) w
s+++@ GM+(-) A-(+) GS+(-) h(++) p>+ LA!(--) C+ CG-- F+(-) c(---)>+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________________________

"Hey, at least I'm not a troll!"
-- Slogan on T-shirt worn by
my ghoul/ex-merc PC.
______________________________________________________________________
Message no. 6
From: robertennew@*****.com.au (Robert Ennew)
Subject: Slightly OT Re: Anti-roleplaying sentiments
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 19:28:34 +1000 (EST)
--- KiltedJamesman@***.com wrote: > In a message
dated 10/14/2002 4:03:32 AM Eastern
> Daylight Time,
> GuayII@***.com writes:
>
> > The only anti-RPG sentiment that I can think of
> off hand is that some
> > experts have claimed that the Washington DC area
> sniper is "probably a
> loner
> > who plays D&D." (read that after the news about
> the tarot card was
> released...
> > Ugh.)
>
> Funny thing that. I'd been thinking it might've been
> somebody who'd played
> Silent Scope too much and snapped. Before this
> starts a flame war, let me be
> the first to say I have no illusions that games,
> movies, or any other
> entertainment media create psychotic behaviour. They
> only inspire them. These
> same people would still snap...they'd just do it in
> a different but no less
> lethal way in my opinion.

Ugh, ooh, agh, rage subsiding,calm. You don't know how
close you came to me opening up a full can of whoop
ass on you man. Your just lucky my friend here held me
back, jus' saved your life man.etc - the animal in
mystery men. (GZ)

http://careers.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Careers
- 1,000's of jobs waiting online for you!

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Slightly OT Re: Anti-roleplaying sentiments, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.