Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "J. Earl Williams" <IH46@****.BITNET>
Subject: Some questions... (otherwise Tom gets it:)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 92 12:04:25 MST
Mr. Dowd, I know that you have probably gotten a few (hundred/thousand)
letters about Shadowrun II, so I'll be brief. Thanks in advance for the
answers. I appreciate you taking time out to answer ANOTHER SRII
question.

1) On the knockback, page 91, SR2 says that the threshold is 1/2 of the
amount of damage done. On the example, though, it says that a person
who "has taken a Moderate wound must generate more than 2 successes".
Is the "(1 for light, 2 for moderate, and 3 for serious)" the number of
successes needed, or do you half those numbers and round? I want to
make sure I'm not reading this wrong. (oops!)

2) What rules, if any, exist for Deadly +1, etc? Same as first ed,
(whatever that is interpreted as), or different? How do you stage up &
down, and do you peel armor, and do you peel it permanently, or
temporarily, and am I putting you on the floor because you've been
harassed so much over this part?

3)(unrelated). Have you guys thought about a type of adept partially
immune to magic? I worked up some stats, but I was wondering if y'all
had come up with something similar to the Null in Jack Chalker's
_Quintara Marathon_.

Finally, what all is planned for SR? I remember talking to you on the
phone about the German Sourcebook, the LA Sourcebook, The Neo-anarchists
guide to real life (?). What is happening with these, and what else is
happening? (ps. You told me that you would only do a Neo-Anarchist's
guide to North America 2, if you got stuff on cities like New Orleans...
white wolf is (has?) published a 5 parter on New Orleans. Just so you
know.)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Some questions... (otherwise Tom gets it:), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.