From: | "Mercury (Uditha DeSilva uidesilva@*****.meto.govt.uk)" |
---|---|
Subject: | Spotting Drones... |
Date: | Mon, 13 Sep 1993 17:25:37 +0000 |
buzz a castle with his `recon' drone. The only rules as to how easy it could be
spotted was to use its signature, which is pathetically low -- 3 -- the same as
a large number of MUCH bigger passenger aircraft. We couldn't come up with a
reasonable answer as to what target number to use for electronic detection of
this thing, so in the end the GM decided that the sensors for the anti-aircraft
missile battery hadn't spotted it... made the rigger happier; the GM initially
used a Perception test with Signature as the TN, which was EASILY made by the
guy manning the SAM battery, and the TN for hitting that drone was 3....
BTW, there doesn't seem to be a `cheap' way of stealthing-up these drones... it
costs almost as much as the drone to increase its signature, according to our
rigger...
Anyone out there hit this situation? Any ideas?
____/V\ercury___ Uditha DeSilva UK Met Office, Bracknell, Berkshire
+44 344 854526 uidesilva@*****.meto.govt.uk
Fallback: desilva%zeus.dnet%hooke.dnet@******.atm.ox.ac.uk
The views expressed are my own. mine,mine, all mine <droool...>