Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Peter Mikulsky PeterMikulsky@********.de
Subject: SR2 - Karmacosts for weapon foki
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 20:51:57 +0200
Hi folks!

Can someone tell me the costs for binding a weaponfocus. I'm not sure but I
fear that the costs in the german version are different from the english
version.

Please tell me the costs from the Grimore.

Thanx in advance.

Peter
Message no. 2
From: Phil Smith phil_urbanhell@*******.com
Subject: SR2 - Karmacosts for weapon foki
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 08:41:29 GMT
>From: PeterMikulsky@********.de (Peter Mikulsky)
>Can someone tell me the costs for binding a weaponfocus. I'm not sure but I
>fear that the costs in the german version are different from the english
>version.

MITS has it down as [(reach+1)x100,000¥]+Forcex90,000¥ and a karma cost of
(3+reach)xforce which squares with the costs in SR3

Phil

Dieing is an art like everything else.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
Message no. 3
From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: SR2 - Karmacosts for weapon foki
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 12:02:09 +0200
According to Peter Mikulsky, at 20:51 on 14 Oct 00, the word on the street
was...

> Can someone tell me the costs for binding a weaponfocus. I'm not sure but I
> fear that the costs in the german version are different from the english
> version.

There are different values for that in SR2 and the Grimoire, so that may
be the cause of the confusion.

SR2 p. 137:
Weapon Focus, Small: 4 x Rating
Weapon Focus, Large: 5 x Rating

(Note that it doesn't say what should be considered a a small and what a
large weapon focus.)

Grimoire II p. 27:
Weapon Focus: 6 x Rating

(This is the base cost, and can be reduced by making an Enchanting test
with a TN equal to the focus rating, every two successes reducing the cost
by 1 Karma.)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
It was a warning shot that missed.
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+@ UL P L+ E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X+ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 4
From: Peter Mikulsky PeterMikulsky@********.de
Subject: SR2 - Karmacosts for weapon foki
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 17:55:43 +0200
And Gurth wrote:

> There are different values for that in SR2 and the Grimoire, so that may
> be the cause of the confusion.
>
<big snip>

Yes, thats right. My first thought was that FanPro has changed that on their
own opinion - wouldn't be the first time. ;-)


Thanx for assistance.

Peter
Message no. 5
From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: SR2 - Karmacosts for weapon foki
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 19:13:15 +0200
According to Peter Mikulsky, at 17:55 on 15 Oct 00, the word on the street
was...

> Yes, thats right. My first thought was that FanPro has changed that on their
> own opinion - wouldn't be the first time. ;-)

Nope, in this case FASA's rules were just as confusing :)

> Thanx for assistance.

Not a problem.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
It was a warning shot that missed.
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+@ UL P L+ E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X+ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about SR2 - Karmacosts for weapon foki, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!