Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@*******.net>
Subject: Re: [SR2] Who knows what evil... (campaign)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 11:52:23 -0400 (EDT)
At 10:18 AM 8/13/96 -0500, you wrote:

>If you give it stats, someone will kill it, but here is my take anyway:
The >Shadow has a very high power Invisibility spell, and Mind Probe (with a
range >of LOS speaking distance), very high Stealth skill, and an Int of 7
or 8. He
>seldom uses the Mind Probe. Also, give him lots of various skills, as he is a
>man of many talents. Dont forget loads of Ettiquette skills (for his large
>number of agents).
>Doesn't sound so tough? He is if the GM plays him right.

Perhaps making him a free spirit of some sort would work better?

That way, he does need the invisibility spell ("he just faeded away from
sight!") and you wouldn't have to sweat over drain for those nasty spells.

I'm not sure of a background, but perhaps he used to be a Mage Detective's ally
who was brutally killed by some bad guys.

--
"I dyde shyte thre grete toordes." Fables of Aesop,
Caxton translation,
V15 1484
Message no. 2
From: Mike Elkins <MikeE@*********.com>
Subject: Re: [SR2] Who knows what evil... (campaign) -Reply
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 14:00:47 -0500
A spirit would perform the role quite well, but the REAL Shadow was wealthy
playboy Lamont Cranston, who had learned the mysteries of the east, giving him
the power to cloud men's minds... :)

A campaign with the players the agents of a free spirit, or dragon, or "good"
vampire, could work just as well.

Double-Domed Mike

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [SR2] Who knows what evil... (campaign), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.