Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: zebulingod@*******.net (zebulingod@*******.net)
Subject: SR4 Qualities
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 19:50:30 +0000
As these are basically Edges & Flaws reworked, is there a set way to convert the
E&F from the SR Companion for use in SR4? I thought it would be 1pt E/F = ±5BP,
does that sound right?

Zebulin
Message no. 2
From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: SR4 Qualities
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:33:21 +0200
According to zebulingod@*******.net, on 9-9-05 21:50 the word on the
street was...

> As these are basically Edges & Flaws reworked, is there a set way
> to convert the E&F from the SR Companion for use in SR4? I thought
> it would be 1pt E/F = ±5BP, does that sound right?

That's what it said in the playtest material, so you should be safe with
that kind of multiplier.

--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
de limme
-> Possibly NAGEE Editor & ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Site: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UB+ P(+) L++ E W++(--) N o? K w-- O
M+ PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 3
From: bullcon@*****.com (Bull)
Subject: SR4 Qualities
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:39:21 -0400
On 9/10/05, Gurth <gurth@******.nl> wrote:
>
> According to zebulingod@*******.net, on 9-9-05 21:50 the word on the
> street was...
>
> > As these are basically Edges & Flaws reworked, is there a set way
> > to convert the E&F from the SR Companion for use in SR4? I thought
> > it would be 1pt E/F = ±5BP, does that sound right?
>
> That's what it said in the playtest material, so you should be safe with
> that kind of multiplier.

I think a few were tweaked for rebalancing, but... That's about on par, I
think. At least as a temp measure till the rest are published.
Bull
Message no. 4
From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: SR4 Qualities
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:46:17 +0200
According to Bull, on 11-9-05 12:39 the word on the street was...

> I think a few were tweaked for rebalancing, but... That's about on par, I
> think. At least as a temp measure till the rest are published.

My idea, too. This is just like when SR3 was released, and you had to
figure out your own rules for things like cyberware from Shadowtech
until Man & Machine was released -- you probably won't duplicate the
upcoming FanPro rules exactly, but in 99% of cases you'll get close
enough that that doesn't really matter.

--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
de limme
-> Possibly NAGEE Editor & ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Site: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UB+ P(+) L++ E W++(--) N o? K w-- O
M+ PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about SR4 Qualities, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!