Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: l-hansen@*****.tele.dk (Lars Wagner Hansen)
Subject: SR7? Was: SR4 FAQ part4
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:43:18 +0200
From: "efreeman" <efreeman@*****.net>
<Snip>
> One neat thing this does is to make SR7 meaningful; in terms of expected
> successes, the jumps 5 -> 6 -> 7 are commensurate.

When did they announce SR7?

I didn't even get the SR4 main book, and now we are up to SR7. Things are
going fast these days.

Lars
Message no. 2
From: maxnoel_fr@*****.fr (Max Noel)
Subject: SR7? Was: SR4 FAQ part4
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:52:23 +0100
On Apr 17, 2005, at 16:43, Lars Wagner Hansen wrote:

> From: "efreeman" <efreeman@*****.net>
> <Snip>
>> One neat thing this does is to make SR7 meaningful; in terms of
>> expected
>> successes, the jumps 5 -> 6 -> 7 are commensurate.
>
> When did they announce SR7?
>
> I didn't even get the SR4 main book, and now we are up to SR7. Things
> are going fast these days.

I think he meant TN7. "Target Number" translates to words whose
initials aren't T and N in a number of languages -- my native French
being one (in which the official translation is "Seuil de Réussite", or
SR).
Speaking of which, you may see me accidentally refer to the SR3 damage
levels as L/M/G/F. Don't worry, that's just French for L/M/S/D.

-- Wild_Cat
maxnoel_fr at yahoo dot fr -- ICQ #85274019
"Look at you hacker... A pathetic creature of meat and bone, panting
and sweating as you run through my corridors... How can you challenge a
perfect, immortal machine?"
Message no. 3
From: l-hansen@*****.tele.dk (Lars Wagner Hansen)
Subject: SR7? Was: SR4 FAQ part4
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:58:59 +0200
From: "Max Noel" <maxnoel_fr@*****.fr>
> Speaking of which, you may see me accidentally refer to the SR3 damage
> levels as L/M/G/F. Don't worry, that's just French for L/M/S/D.

As in Light, Medium, Gaah... and Fucked!

:-)

Lars

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about SR7? Was: SR4 FAQ part4, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.