From: | Faux Pas <fauxpas@******.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Wed, 22 May 1996 00:32:37 -0500 |
next game session. That means you too, LANDON GREGORY. Same goes for the wife.
From: | Faux Pas <fauxpas@******.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Wed, 22 May 1996 00:32:37 -0500 |
From: | Faux Pas <fauxpas@******.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Wed, 22 May 1996 00:39:12 -0500 |
From: | melchar@****.darkside.com (Melchar) |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Wed, 22 May 96 11:58:39 PDT |
From: | Ubiquitous <weberm@*******.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Wed, 22 May 1996 21:01:26 -0400 (EDT) |
From: | "Damion Milliken" <dam01@***.edu.au> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Thu, 23 May 1996 21:18:38 +1000 (EST) |
From: | Faux Pas <fauxpas@******.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Thu, 23 May 1996 15:22:20 -0500 |
From: | mbroadwa@*******.glenayre.com (Mike Broadwater) |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Thu, 23 May 1996 15:29:56 -0500 |
From: | seb@***.ripco.com (Sebastian Wiers) |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Thu, 23 May 1996 19:28:46 -0500 (CDT) |
From: | Faux Pas <fauxpas@******.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Thu, 23 May 1996 20:41:47 -0500 |
From: | Ubiquitous <weberm@*******.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Thu, 23 May 1996 22:58:24 -0400 (EDT) |
From: | Ubiquitous <weberm@*******.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SR: Critter Question |
Date: | Thu, 23 May 1996 23:11:17 -0400 (EDT) |
If you enjoyed reading about SR: Critter Question, you may also be interested in:
These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.